Product comparison · 2 network switches

Allied Telesis AT-GS900/16-50 Unmanaged vs NETGEAR ProSafe Plus 5 Port Gigabit Ethernet Switch

Add a product
  • 10specifications compared
  • 7differ
  • 3identical
  • 24known for one product only

Key differences

  • Basic switching RJ-45 Ethernet ports quantity
    • AT-GS900/16-50 Unmanaged:16
    • ProSafe Plus 5 Port Gigabit Ethernet Switch:5
  • MAC address table
    • AT-GS900/16-50 Unmanaged:8000 entries
    • ProSafe Plus 5 Port Gigabit Ethernet Switch:4096 entries
  • Maximum data transfer rate
    • AT-GS900/16-50 Unmanaged:32 Gbit/s
    • ProSafe Plus 5 Port Gigabit Ethernet Switch:2 Gbit/s
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • AT-GS900/16-50 Unmanaged:15.3 W
    • ProSafe Plus 5 Port Gigabit Ethernet Switch:4 W
  • Dimensions (WxDxH)
    • AT-GS900/16-50 Unmanaged:330 x 230 x 43.2 mm
    • ProSafe Plus 5 Port Gigabit Ethernet Switch:94 x 104 x 28 mm
  • Weight
    • AT-GS900/16-50 Unmanaged:2.38 kg
    • ProSafe Plus 5 Port Gigabit Ethernet Switch:300 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of AT-GS900/16-50, ProSafe Plus 5 Port Gigabit Ethernet Switch
34 specifications
A

Allied Telesis

AT-GS900/16-50 Unmanaged

Model AT-GS900/16-50

View product
Management featuresidentical
Quality of Service (QoS) supportKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Basic switching RJ-45 Ethernet ports quantityDiffers165
Power connectorKnown for oneDC-in jackUnknown — not stated by the source
Network1 differ
Networking standardsDiffersIEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.3u, IEEE 802.3x, IEEE 802.3zIEEE 802.1p, IEEE 802.1Q, IEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.3i, IEEE 802.3u
Copper ethernet cabling technologyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1000BASE-T, 100BASE-TX, 10BASE-T
Full duplexKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Flow control supportKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Auto MDI/MDI-XKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Data transmission2 differ
MAC address tableDiffers8000 entries4096 entries
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers32 Gbit/s2 Gbit/s
Supported data transfer ratesKnown for one10/100/1000 MbpsUnknown — not stated by the source
Switching capacityKnown for one32 Gbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
StackableKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
SafetyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceUL listed (UL 1950)/CUL, CB
Performanceidentical
Noise levelKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0 dB
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5905968 h
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs15.3 W4 W
Input currentKnown for one1 AUnknown — not stated by the source
Input voltageKnown for one100 - 240 VUnknown — not stated by the source
Other features1 differ
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs330 x 230 x 43.2 mm94 x 104 x 28 mm
BandwidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10 Gbit/s
Networking featuresKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceGigabit Ethernet
Power requirementsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source12V, 1.0A
Connectivity LEDsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Electromagnetic emissionsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCE mark, FCC 15 B, EN 55022 (CISPR 22) B, VCCI B, C-Tick
Data transfer rateKnown for one23.8 Mbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source
Input frequencyKnown for one50/60 HzUnknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0 - 50 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0 - 90%
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers2.38 kg300 g
Certificatesidentical
CertificationKnown for oneUL 1950, FCC/EN55022 Class A, VCCI Class A, C-Tick, EN60950 (TUV), EN55024, CEUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network switch comparisons

All network switch comparisons