Product comparison · 2 network switches

Allied Telesis AT-FS909M-50 Managed L2 Fast Ethernet (10/100) Grey vs Allied Telesis AT-FS917M-50 Managed L2 Fast Ethernet (10/100) Grey

Add a product
  • 48specifications compared
  • 12differ
  • 36identical
  • 2known for one product only

Key differences

The Allied Telesis AT-FS917M-50 Managed L2 Fast Ethernet (10/100) Grey has 8 more basic switching RJ-45 Ethernet ports quantity than the Allied Telesis AT-FS909M-50 Managed L2 Fast Ethernet (10/100) Grey (16 vs 8). The Allied Telesis AT-FS917M-50 Managed L2 Fast Ethernet (10/100) Grey has 2.6 Gbit/s more switching capacity than the Allied Telesis AT-FS909M-50 Managed L2 Fast Ethernet (10/100) Grey (8.2 Gbit/s vs 5.6 Gbit/s). The Allied Telesis AT-FS917M-50 Managed L2 Fast Ethernet (10/100) Grey has 1.19 Mpps more throughput than the Allied Telesis AT-FS909M-50 Managed L2 Fast Ethernet (10/100) Grey (3.87 Mpps vs 2.68 Mpps). MIB support: RFC1213, RFC2665, RFC2863, RFC1493, on the Allied Telesis AT-FS909M-50 Managed L2 Fast Ethernet (10/100) Grey, RFC1213, RFC2665, RFC2863, RFC1493 on the Allied Telesis AT-FS917M-50 Managed L2 Fast Ethernet (10/100) Grey. Management protocols: IGMP, MLD on the Allied Telesis AT-FS909M-50 Managed L2 Fast Ethernet (10/100) Grey, SNMP, Telnet on the Allied Telesis AT-FS917M-50 Managed L2 Fast Ethernet (10/100) Grey.

  • Basic switching RJ-45 Ethernet ports quantity
    • AT-FS909M-50 Managed L2 Fast Ethernet (10/100) Grey:8
    • AT-FS917M-50 Managed L2 Fast Ethernet (10/100) Grey:16
  • Switching capacity
    • AT-FS909M-50 Managed L2 Fast Ethernet (10/100) Grey:5.6 Gbit/s
    • AT-FS917M-50 Managed L2 Fast Ethernet (10/100) Grey:8.2 Gbit/s
  • Throughput
    • AT-FS909M-50 Managed L2 Fast Ethernet (10/100) Grey:2.68 Mpps
    • AT-FS917M-50 Managed L2 Fast Ethernet (10/100) Grey:3.87 Mpps
  • Management protocols
    • AT-FS909M-50 Managed L2 Fast Ethernet (10/100) Grey:IGMP, MLD
    • AT-FS917M-50 Managed L2 Fast Ethernet (10/100) Grey:SNMP, Telnet
  • Supported network protocols
    • AT-FS909M-50 Managed L2 Fast Ethernet (10/100) Grey:BPDU, DHCP, SNTP
    • AT-FS917M-50 Managed L2 Fast Ethernet (10/100) Grey:SNTP, DHCP, IGMP
  • Input current
    • AT-FS909M-50 Managed L2 Fast Ethernet (10/100) Grey:0.2 A
    • AT-FS917M-50 Managed L2 Fast Ethernet (10/100) Grey:0.3 A
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • AT-FS909M-50 Managed L2 Fast Ethernet (10/100) Grey:7.4 W
    • AT-FS917M-50 Managed L2 Fast Ethernet (10/100) Grey:9.1 W
  • Power consumption (max)
    • AT-FS909M-50 Managed L2 Fast Ethernet (10/100) Grey:11 W
    • AT-FS917M-50 Managed L2 Fast Ethernet (10/100) Grey:13 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of AT-FS909M-50, AT-FS917M-50
50 specifications
Management features1 differ
MIB supportDiffersRFC1213, RFC2665, RFC2863, RFC1493,RFC1213, RFC2665, RFC2863, RFC1493
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Basic switching RJ-45 Ethernet ports quantityDiffers816
Network1 differ
Networking standardsDiffersIEEE 802.1D, IEEE 802.1p, IEEE 802.1Q, IEEE 802.1w, IEEE 802.1x, IEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.3ad, IEEE 802.3ah, IEEE 802.3u, IEEE 802.3x, IEEE 802.3zIEEE 802.1D, IEEE 802.1p, IEEE 802.1Q, IEEE 802.1w, IEEE 802.1x, IEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.3ad, IEEE 802.3ah, IEEE 802.3u, IEEE 802.3z
Data transmission2 differ
Switching capacityDiffers5.6 Gbit/s8.2 Gbit/s
ThroughputDiffers2.68 Mpps3.87 Mpps
Protocols2 differ
Management protocolsDiffersIGMP, MLDSNMP, Telnet
Supported network protocolsDiffersBPDU, DHCP, SNTPSNTP, DHCP, IGMP
Design1 differ
SafetyDiffersVCCI, UL60950-1, CSA-C22.2 No. 60950-1UL60950-1, CSA-C22.2 No. 60950-1
Performanceidentical
Internal memoryKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source32 MB
Flash memoryKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source8 MB
Power3 differ
Input currentDiffers0.2 A0.3 A
Power consumption (typical)Differs7.4 W9.1 W
Power consumption (max)Differs11 W13 W
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers1.3 kg1.4 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network switch comparisons

All network switch comparisons