Product comparison · 2 network switches

Allied Telesis AT-FS709FC-50 Unmanaged vs NETGEAR ProSafe Plus 5 Port Gigabit Ethernet Switch

Add a product
  • 10specifications compared
  • 7differ
  • 3identical
  • 22known for one product only

Key differences

  • Basic switching RJ-45 Ethernet ports quantity
    • AT-FS709FC-50 Unmanaged:8
    • ProSafe Plus 5 Port Gigabit Ethernet Switch:5
  • MAC address table
    • AT-FS709FC-50 Unmanaged:4000 entries
    • ProSafe Plus 5 Port Gigabit Ethernet Switch:4096 entries
  • Maximum data transfer rate
    • AT-FS709FC-50 Unmanaged:1 Gbit/s
    • ProSafe Plus 5 Port Gigabit Ethernet Switch:2 Gbit/s
  • Dimensions (WxDxH)
    • AT-FS709FC-50 Unmanaged:220 x 120 x 36 mm
    • ProSafe Plus 5 Port Gigabit Ethernet Switch:94 x 104 x 28 mm
  • Operating temperature (T-T)
    • AT-FS709FC-50 Unmanaged:0 - 40 °C
    • ProSafe Plus 5 Port Gigabit Ethernet Switch:0 - 50 °C
  • Operating relative humidity (H-H)
    • AT-FS709FC-50 Unmanaged:0 - 80%
    • ProSafe Plus 5 Port Gigabit Ethernet Switch:0 - 90%
  • Weight
    • AT-FS709FC-50 Unmanaged:2 kg
    • ProSafe Plus 5 Port Gigabit Ethernet Switch:300 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of AT-FS709FC-50, ProSafe Plus 5 Port Gigabit Ethernet Switch
32 specifications
A

Allied Telesis

AT-FS709FC-50 Unmanaged

Model AT-FS709FC-50

View product
Management featuresidentical
Switch typeUnmanagedUnmanaged
Quality of Service (QoS) supportKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Basic switching RJ-45 Ethernet ports quantityDiffers85
Power connectorKnown for oneDC-in jackUnknown — not stated by the source
Networkidentical
Networking standardsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceIEEE 802.1p, IEEE 802.1Q, IEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.3i, IEEE 802.3u
Copper ethernet cabling technologyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1000BASE-T, 100BASE-TX, 10BASE-T
Full duplexKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Flow control supportKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
10G supportKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Auto MDI/MDI-XKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Data transmission2 differ
MAC address tableDiffers4000 entries4096 entries
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers1 Gbit/s2 Gbit/s
Supported data transfer ratesKnown for one10/100 MbpsUnknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
StackableKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
SafetyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceUL listed (UL 1950)/CUL, CB
Performanceidentical
Noise levelKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0 dB
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5905968 h
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4 W
Power over Ethernet (PoE)identical
Power over Ethernet (PoE)NoNo
Other features1 differ
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs220 x 120 x 36 mm94 x 104 x 28 mm
Connectivity technologyWiredWired
BandwidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10 Gbit/s
Networking featuresKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceGigabit Ethernet
Power requirementsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source12V, 1.0A
Connectivity LEDsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Electromagnetic emissionsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCE mark, FCC 15 B, EN 55022 (CISPR 22) B, VCCI B, C-Tick
Operational conditions2 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs0 - 40 °C0 - 50 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs0 - 80%0 - 90%
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-20 - 60 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one0 - 95%Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers2 kg300 g
Certificatesidentical
CertificationKnown for oneFCC Class A, EN55022, CE Mark, Commercial, UL and CSA listed, VCCI Class A, EN60950 (TUV), EN55024Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network switch comparisons

All network switch comparisons