Product comparison · 2 network switches

Allied Telesis AT-8000S/48-50 network switch Managed Silver vs Zyxel GS-1548 Managed Black

Add a product
  • 19specifications compared
  • 12differ
  • 7identical
  • 33known for one product only

Key differences

The Zyxel GS-1548 Managed Black has 2 more combo SFP ports quantity than the Allied Telesis AT-8000S/48-50 network switch Managed Silver (4 vs 2). The Zyxel GS-1548 Managed Black has 2 more SFP/SFP+ slots quantity than the Allied Telesis AT-8000S/48-50 network switch Managed Silver (4 vs 2). The Zyxel GS-1548 Managed Black has 78.4 Gbit/s more switching capacity than the Allied Telesis AT-8000S/48-50 network switch Managed Silver (96 Gbit/s vs 17.6 Gbit/s). Product colour: Silver on the Allied Telesis AT-8000S/48-50 network switch Managed Silver, Black on the Zyxel GS-1548 Managed Black. Dimensions (WxDxH): 440 x 257 x 43.2 mm on the Allied Telesis AT-8000S/48-50 network switch Managed Silver, 438 x 240 x 44.45 mm on the Zyxel GS-1548 Managed Black.

  • Combo SFP ports quantity
    • AT-8000S/48-50 network switch Managed Silver:2
    • GS-1548 Managed Black:4
  • SFP/SFP+ slots quantity
    • AT-8000S/48-50 network switch Managed Silver:2
    • GS-1548 Managed Black:4
  • Switching capacity
    • AT-8000S/48-50 network switch Managed Silver:17.6 Gbit/s
    • GS-1548 Managed Black:96 Gbit/s
  • Maximum data transfer rate
    • AT-8000S/48-50 network switch Managed Silver:0.1 Gbit/s
    • GS-1548 Managed Black:1 Gbit/s
  • Product colour
    • AT-8000S/48-50 network switch Managed Silver:Silver
    • GS-1548 Managed Black:Black
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • AT-8000S/48-50 network switch Managed Silver:54 W
    • GS-1548 Managed Black:82 W
  • Dimensions (WxDxH)
    • AT-8000S/48-50 network switch Managed Silver:440 x 257 x 43.2 mm
    • GS-1548 Managed Black:438 x 240 x 44.45 mm
  • Power requirements
    • AT-8000S/48-50 network switch Managed Silver:100-240V; 12V; 1.5A
    • GS-1548 Managed Black:100-240VAC, 50/60Hz

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of AT-8000S/48-50, GS-1548
52 specifications
Management featuresidentical
Switch typeManagedManaged
Quality of Service (QoS) supportKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
System event logKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces2 differ
Basic switching RJ-45 Ethernet ports quantity4848
Combo SFP ports quantityDiffers24
SFP/SFP+ slots quantityDiffers24
Console portKnown for oneRS-232Unknown — not stated by the source
Gigabit Ethernet (copper) ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source44
Network1 differ
Networking standardsDiffersIEEE 802.1D, IEEE 802.1s, IEEE 802.1W, IEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.3ad, IEEE 802.3u, IEEE 802.3x, IEEE 802.3zIEEE 802.1p, IEEE 802.3ad, IEEE 802.3x, IEEE 802.3z
Full duplexKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Flow control supportKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Rate limitingKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Data transmission2 differ
MAC address table8000 entries8000 entries
Switching capacityDiffers17.6 Gbit/s96 Gbit/s
ThroughputKnown for one13.09 MppsUnknown — not stated by the source
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers0.1 Gbit/s1 Gbit/s
Jumbo frames supportKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Securityidentical
DHCP featuresKnown for oneDHCP server, DHCP clientUnknown — not stated by the source
Access Control List (ACL)Known for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
MAC address filteringYesYes
Security algorithmsKnown for oneSSHUnknown — not stated by the source
Static port securityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Protocols1 differ
Management protocolsDiffersSNMP, MIB, RMON, HTTP, Telnet, TFTP, HTMLWeb-based, Telnet CLI, SNMP v1, RMON-Lite
Design1 differ
Rack mountingKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Product colourDiffersSilverBlack
SafetyKnown for oneUL 1950 (UL/cUL), EN60950 (TUV)Unknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
Processor frequencyKnown for one400 MHzUnknown — not stated by the source
Memory typeKnown for oneRAMUnknown — not stated by the source
Internal memoryKnown for one64 MBUnknown — not stated by the source
Flash memoryKnown for one16 MBUnknown — not stated by the source
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Known for one314322 hUnknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power sourceKnown for oneAC/DCUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (typical)Differs54 W82 W
Power over Ethernet (PoE)identical
Power over Ethernet (PoE)NoNo
Other features2 differ
Data transfer rateKnown for one10 Mbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs440 x 257 x 43.2 mm438 x 240 x 44.45 mm
Connectivity technologyKnown for oneWiredUnknown — not stated by the source
Authentication methodKnown for oneTACACS+, RADIUSUnknown — not stated by the source
Power requirementsDiffers100-240V; 12V; 1.5A100-240VAC, 50/60Hz
Size (imperial)Known for one48.3 cm (19")Unknown — not stated by the source
Electromagnetic emissionsKnown for oneFCC Class A, EN55022 Class A, VCCI Class A, C-Tick, EN61000-3-2, EN61000-3-3Unknown — not stated by the source
Electromagnetic immunityKnown for oneEN55024Unknown — not stated by the source
Technical featuresKnown for oneVLANUnknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)0 - 45 °C0 - 45 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)-25 - 70 °C-25 - 70 °C
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one5 - 95%Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating altitudeKnown for one0 - 3000 mUnknown — not stated by the source
Relative humidityKnown for one10 - 90%Unknown — not stated by the source
Heat dissipationKnown for one18441 BTU/hUnknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10 - 90%
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers3.38 kg3.7 kg
Certificates1 differ
CertificationDiffersRoHS- UL 60950-1 - CSA 60950-1 - EN 60950-1 - IEC 60950-1

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network switch comparisons

All network switch comparisons