Product comparison · 2 network switches

Allied Telesis 8 port 10/100 Unmanaged POE Switch vs Zyxel ES-3024 Managed Layer 2 Stackable Switch

13specifications compared
11differ
2identical
18known for one product only

Key differences

Switch type
- 8 port 10/100 Unmanaged POE Switch:Unmanaged
- ES-3024 Managed Layer 2 Stackable Switch:Managed
Basic switching RJ-45 Ethernet ports quantity
- 8 port 10/100 Unmanaged POE Switch:8
- ES-3024 Managed Layer 2 Stackable Switch:24
MAC address table
- 8 port 10/100 Unmanaged POE Switch:8192 entries
- ES-3024 Managed Layer 2 Stackable Switch:16000 entries
Maximum data transfer rate
- 8 port 10/100 Unmanaged POE Switch:0.1 Gbit/s
- ES-3024 Managed Layer 2 Stackable Switch:1 Gbit/s
Power consumption (typical)
- 8 port 10/100 Unmanaged POE Switch:90 W
- ES-3024 Managed Layer 2 Stackable Switch:60 W
Power over Ethernet (PoE)
- 8 port 10/100 Unmanaged POE Switch:Yes
- ES-3024 Managed Layer 2 Stackable Switch:No
Dimensions (WxDxH)
- 8 port 10/100 Unmanaged POE Switch:330 x 220 x 43 mm
- ES-3024 Managed Layer 2 Stackable Switch:440 x 300 x 44.5 mm
Power requirements
- 8 port 10/100 Unmanaged POE Switch:90-240V AC
- ES-3024 Managed Layer 2 Stackable Switch:100-240VAC, 50/60Hz

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 8 port 10/100 Unmanaged POE Switch, ES-3024 Managed Layer 2 Stackable Switch
31 specifications	A Allied Telesis 8 port 10/100 Unmanaged POE Switch View product	B Zyxel ES-3024 Managed Layer 2 Stackable Switch View product
Management features1 differ
Switch typeDiffers	Unmanaged	Managed
Switch layerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	L2
Quality of Service (QoS) supportKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Basic switching RJ-45 Ethernet ports quantityDiffers	8	24
Network1 differ
Networking standardsDiffers	IEEE 802.3af, IEEE 802.3i, IEEE 802.3u, IEEE 802.3x	IEEE 802.1d, IEEE 802.1p, IEEE 802.1Q, IEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3u, IEEE 802.3x
Full duplexKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Port mirroringKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Flow control supportKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Link aggregationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Data transmission2 differ
MAC address tableDiffers	8192 entries	16000 entries
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers	0.1 Gbit/s	1 Gbit/s
Securityidentical
MAC address filtering	Yes	Yes
Designidentical
Rack mountingKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
StackableKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	90 W	60 W
Power over Ethernet (PoE)1 differ
Power over Ethernet (PoE)Differs	Yes	No
Other features2 differ
Data transfer rateKnown for one	10 Mbit/s	Unknown — not stated by the source
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs	330 x 220 x 43 mm	440 x 300 x 44.5 mm
Connectivity technologyKnown for one	Wired	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power requirementsDiffers	90-240V AC	100-240VAC, 50/60Hz
Connectivity LEDsKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Management platformKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Web-based
Wi-FiKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
I/O portsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	24 x 10/100Base-T, RJ-45 1 x RJ-45
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	0 - 40 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage temperature (T-T)Differs	-25 - 70 °C	0 - 45 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)	10 - 90%	10 - 90%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	5 - 95%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers	1.9 kg	5.3 kg
Certificatesidentical
CertificationKnown for one	UL1950, TUV, UL, C-Tick, CE Mark, FCC 15, CISPR 22, EN55022	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network switch comparisons

All network switch comparisons