Product comparison · 2 network switch modules

LevelOne 6-Port SC Multi-mode Fiber Optic Module vs NETGEAR XCM8948 network switch module Gigabit Ethernet

2specifications compared
2differ
0identical
30known for one product only

Key differences

Compatibility: IES-2892 on the LevelOne 6-Port SC Multi-mode Fiber Optic Module, Netgear M6100 on the NETGEAR XCM8948 network switch module Gigabit Ethernet. Weight: 280 g on the LevelOne 6-Port SC Multi-mode Fiber Optic Module, 7.12 kg on the NETGEAR XCM8948 network switch module Gigabit Ethernet.

Compatibility
- 6-Port SC Multi-mode Fiber Optic Module:IES-2892
- XCM8948 network switch module Gigabit Ethernet:Netgear M6100
Weight
- 6-Port SC Multi-mode Fiber Optic Module:280 g
- XCM8948 network switch module Gigabit Ethernet:7.12 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of MDU-2892FX, XCM8948
32 specifications	A LevelOne 6-Port SC Multi-mode Fiber Optic Module Model MDU-2892FX View product	B NETGEAR XCM8948 network switch module Gigabit Ethernet Model XCM8948 View product
Networkidentical
Ethernet interface typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Gigabit Ethernet
Ethernet LAN data ratesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10,100,1000 Mbit/s
Copper ethernet cabling technologyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1000BASE-T, 100BASE-TX, 10BASE-T
Flow control supportKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Networking standardsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	IEEE 802.1ab, IEEE 802.1D, IEEE 802.1p, IEEE 802.1Q, IEEE 802.1s, IEEE 802.1v, IEEE 802.1w, IEEE 802.1x, IEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.3ac, IEEE 802.3ad, IEEE 802.3af, IEEE 802.3at, IEEE 802.3u, IEEE 802.3x
Jumbo frames supportKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Link aggregationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Data transmissionidentical
Data transfer rateKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 Gbit/s
Ports & interfacesidentical
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	48
Fiber ports quantityKnown for one	6	Unknown — not stated by the source
Performance1 differ
Quality of Service (QoS) supportKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Queues per portKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	7
Access Control List (ACL)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Security algorithmsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	802.1x RADIUS, HTTPS, SSH, SSL/TLS
CompatibilityDiffers	IES-2892	Netgear M6100
Operational conditionsidentical
Non-operating altitudeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0 - 3000 m
Operating altitudeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0 - 3000 m
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0 - 50 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-20 - 70 °C
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers	280 g	7.12 kg
WidthKnown for one	100 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one	120 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one	43 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	100 x 120 x 43 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	85176990
Country of originKnown for one	Taiwan	Unknown — not stated by the source
Optical fiberidentical
Fiber optic connectorKnown for one	SC	Unknown — not stated by the source
Fiber typeKnown for one	Multi-mode	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	160 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one	50 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one	160 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one	300 g	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network switch module comparisons

All network switch module comparisons