Product comparison · 2 network switch modules

HP Brocade 4Gb SAN Switch vs NETGEAR XCM8848T-10000S network switch module

Add a product
  • 5specifications compared
  • 5differ
  • 0identical
  • 19known for one product only

Key differences

The HP Brocade 4Gb SAN Switch has 3.24 Gbit/s more data transfer rate than the NETGEAR XCM8848T-10000S network switch module (4.24 Gbit/s vs 1 Gbit/s). The NETGEAR XCM8848T-10000S network switch module has 47 more Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports than the HP Brocade 4Gb SAN Switch (48 vs 1). Ethernet LAN data rates: 10,100 Mbit/s on the HP Brocade 4Gb SAN Switch, 10,100,1000 Mbit/s on the NETGEAR XCM8848T-10000S network switch module. Dimensions (WxDxH): 86.6 x 114.1 x 38.7 mm on the HP Brocade 4Gb SAN Switch, 363 x 122 x 31 mm on the NETGEAR XCM8848T-10000S network switch module. Weight: 360 g on the HP Brocade 4Gb SAN Switch, 3.52 kg on the NETGEAR XCM8848T-10000S network switch module.

  • Ethernet LAN data rates
    • Brocade 4Gb SAN Switch:10,100 Mbit/s
    • XCM8848T-10000S network switch module:10,100,1000 Mbit/s
  • Data transfer rate
    • Brocade 4Gb SAN Switch:4.24 Gbit/s
    • XCM8848T-10000S network switch module:1 Gbit/s
  • Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports
    • Brocade 4Gb SAN Switch:1
    • XCM8848T-10000S network switch module:48
  • Dimensions (WxDxH)
    • Brocade 4Gb SAN Switch:86.6 x 114.1 x 38.7 mm
    • XCM8848T-10000S network switch module:363 x 122 x 31 mm
  • Weight
    • Brocade 4Gb SAN Switch:360 g
    • XCM8848T-10000S network switch module:3.52 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of Brocade 4Gb SAN Switch, XCM8848T-10000S
24 specifications
Network1 differ
Ethernet LAN data ratesDiffers10,100 Mbit/s10,100,1000 Mbit/s
Copper ethernet cabling technologyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1000BASE-T, 100BASE-T, 10BASE-T
Networking standardsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceIEEE 802.1ab, IEEE 802.1Q, IEEE 802.1v
Link aggregationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Cabling technologyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceGigabit Ethernet
Full duplexKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Supported protocolsKnown for oneFC-AL, FC-AL-2, FC-FG, FC-FLA, FC-GS-2, FC-PH, FC-PH-2, FC-PH-3, FC-PLDA, FC-SWUnknown — not stated by the source
Optical fiberidentical
Fiber optic connectorKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceSFP
Fiber typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceSingle-mode
Data transmission1 differ
Data transfer rateDiffers4.24 Gbit/s1 Gbit/s
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsDiffers148
Fiber ports quantityKnown for one4Unknown — not stated by the source
RS-232 interfaceKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
Quality of Service (QoS) supportKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Access Control List (ACL)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Management platformKnown for oneHTTP, SNMP, TelnetUnknown — not stated by the source
CompatibilityKnown for oneServers Proliant BL20pG2 Proliant BL20pG3 Proliant BL25p Proliant BL30p Proliant BL35p Proliant BL40p Proliant BL45p Integrity BL60p ProLiant BL p-Class Server Blade Enclosures BL p-Class Server Blade Enclosure with enhanced backplane components ProLiant BL p-Class Ethernet Switches Cisco Gigabit EtUnknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Power over Ethernet (PoE)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10 - 93%
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0 - 40 °C
Certificatesidentical
SafetyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceUL, CSA, FCC, CDRH
Weight & dimensions2 differ
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs86.6 x 114.1 x 38.7 mm363 x 122 x 31 mm
WeightDiffers360 g3.52 kg
Other featuresidentical
SFP/SFP+ slots quantityKnown for one2Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network switch module comparisons

All network switch module comparisons