Product comparison · 2 network switch modules

D-Link DGS-6600-48S-C network switch module Gigabit Ethernet vs HP Brocade 4Gb SAN Switch

Add a product
  • 3specifications compared
  • 2differ
  • 1identical
  • 29known for one product only

Key differences

Ethernet LAN data rates: 100,1000 Mbit/s on the D-Link DGS-6600-48S-C network switch module Gigabit Ethernet, 10,100 Mbit/s on the HP Brocade 4Gb SAN Switch. Weight: 3.37 kg on the D-Link DGS-6600-48S-C network switch module Gigabit Ethernet, 360 g on the HP Brocade 4Gb SAN Switch.

  • Ethernet LAN data rates
    • DGS-6600-48S-C network switch module Gigabit Ethernet:100,1000 Mbit/s
    • Brocade 4Gb SAN Switch:10,100 Mbit/s
  • Weight
    • DGS-6600-48S-C network switch module Gigabit Ethernet:3.37 kg
    • Brocade 4Gb SAN Switch:360 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of DGS-6600-48S-C, Brocade 4Gb SAN Switch
32 specifications
Network1 differ
Ethernet interface typeKnown for oneGigabit EthernetUnknown — not stated by the source
Ethernet LAN data ratesDiffers100,1000 Mbit/s10,100 Mbit/s
Flow control supportKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Networking standardsKnown for oneIEEE 802.1D, IEEE 802.1s, IEEE 802.1w, IEEE 802.3ad, IEEE 802.3x, IEEE 802.3zUnknown — not stated by the source
Jumbo frames supportKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Link aggregationKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Supported protocolsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceFC-AL, FC-AL-2, FC-FG, FC-FLA, FC-GS-2, FC-PH, FC-PH-2, FC-PH-3, FC-PLDA, FC-SW
Data transmissionidentical
MAC address tableKnown for one32000 entriesUnknown — not stated by the source
Switching capacityKnown for one96 Gbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source
Forwarding rateKnown for one268.44 MppsUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of multicast groupsKnown for one1000Unknown — not stated by the source
Data transfer rateKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4.24 Gbit/s
Ports & interfacesidentical
SFP module slots quantityKnown for one48Unknown — not stated by the source
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Fiber ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4
RS-232 interfaceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Performanceidentical
Quality of Service (QoS) supportKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Queues per portKnown for one8Unknown — not stated by the source
Access Control List (ACL)Known for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Security algorithmsKnown for oneSNMP, SSH-2Unknown — not stated by the source
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Known for one318790 hUnknown — not stated by the source
Management platformKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceHTTP, SNMP, Telnet
CompatibilityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceServers Proliant BL20pG2 Proliant BL20pG3 Proliant BL25p Proliant BL30p Proliant BL35p Proliant BL40p Proliant BL45p Integrity BL60p ProLiant BL p-Class Server Blade Enclosures BL p-Class Server Blade Enclosure with enhanced backplane components ProLiant BL p-Class Ethernet Switches Cisco Gigabit Et
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)Known for one133 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one10 - 90%Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one0 - 50 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one5 - 90%Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-40 - 70 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers3.37 kg360 g
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source86.6 x 114.1 x 38.7 mm
Other featuresidentical
SFP/SFP+ slots quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network switch module comparisons

All network switch module comparisons