Product comparison · 2 network media converters

Microconnect FIBCONRJ45 network media converter vs Microconnect USBEXT100M network media converter Internal

Add a product
  • 8specifications compared
  • 6differ
  • 2identical
  • 5known for one product only

Key differences

  • Internal
    • FIBCONRJ45 network media converter:No
    • USBEXT100M network media converter Internal:Yes
  • Weight
    • FIBCONRJ45 network media converter:238 g
    • USBEXT100M network media converter Internal:10 g
  • Package width
    • FIBCONRJ45 network media converter:216 mm
    • USBEXT100M network media converter Internal:217 mm
  • Package depth
    • FIBCONRJ45 network media converter:156 mm
    • USBEXT100M network media converter Internal:132 mm
  • Package height
    • FIBCONRJ45 network media converter:58 mm
    • USBEXT100M network media converter Internal:49 mm
  • Package weight
    • FIBCONRJ45 network media converter:338 g
    • USBEXT100M network media converter Internal:200 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of FIBCONRJ45, USBEXT100M
13 specifications
Networkidentical
Converter input interfaceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source100Base-TX
Ethernet LAN data ratesKnown for one10 Mbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
Maximum transfer distanceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source100 m
Features1 differ
InternalDiffersNoYes
Ports & interfacesidentical
Fiber ports quantityKnown for one2Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers238 g10 g
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers216 mm217 mm
Package depthDiffers156 mm132 mm
Package heightDiffers58 mm49 mm
Package weightDiffers338 g200 g
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source85176990

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network media converter comparisons

All network media converter comparisons