Product comparison · 2 network media converters

Allied Telesis AT-CM70S network media converter 100 Mbit/s vs Allied Telesis AT-FS201-60 network media converter 100 Mbit/s

9specifications compared
4differ
5identical
6known for one product only

Key differences

Power consumption (typical)
- AT-CM70S network media converter 100 Mbit/s:8.5 W
- AT-FS201-60 network media converter 100 Mbit/s:6 W
Storage temperature (T-T)
- AT-CM70S network media converter 100 Mbit/s:-25 - 70 °C
- AT-FS201-60 network media converter 100 Mbit/s:-20 - 80 °C
Dimensions (WxDxH)
- AT-CM70S network media converter 100 Mbit/s:44 x 73 x 130 mm
- AT-FS201-60 network media converter 100 Mbit/s:105 x 95 x 25 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of AT-CM70S, AT-FS201-60
15 specifications	A Allied Telesis AT-CM70S network media converter 100 Mbit/s Model AT-CM70S View product	B Allied Telesis AT-FS201-60 network media converter 100 Mbit/s Model AT-FS201-60 View product
Performanceidentical
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Known for one	670000 h	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	8.5 W	6 W
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WeightKnown for one	540 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditions1 differ
Storage temperature (T-T)Differs	-25 - 70 °C	-20 - 80 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	5 - 90%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Certificates1 differ
CertificationDiffers	EN55024, FCC class A, EN55022 class A, VCCI class A, C-Tick, CE, UL60950-1 (cULUS), EN60950-1 (TUV)	FCC Class A, UL-Cul, CSA/CSA, NRTL, TUV, CE
Other features1 differ
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs	44 x 73 x 130 mm	105 x 95 x 25 mm
InterfaceKnown for one	RJ-45	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	32 - 104 °F	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power requirementsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	220 - 240 V, 50/60 Hz

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network media converter comparisons

All network media converter comparisons