Product comparison · 2 network management devices

Dell PowerConnect W-6000 M3 vs Vertiv Avocent 4-Port ACS800 Serial Console with external AC/DC Power Brick - Global Datacenter PDU Power Cord

5specifications compared
3differ
2identical
21known for one product only

Key differences

The Dell PowerConnect W-6000 M3 has 10 more Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports than the Vertiv Avocent 4-Port ACS800 Serial Console with external AC/DC Power Brick - Global Datacenter PDU Power Cord (12 vs 2). Ethernet LAN data rates: 10,100,1000,10000 Mbit/s on the Dell PowerConnect W-6000 M3, 10,100,1000 Mbit/s on the Vertiv Avocent 4-Port ACS800 Serial Console with external AC/DC Power Brick - Global Datacenter PDU Power Cord. Console port: RS-232 on the Dell PowerConnect W-6000 M3, RJ-45 on the Vertiv Avocent 4-Port ACS800 Serial Console with external AC/DC Power Brick - Global Datacenter PDU Power Cord.

Ethernet LAN data rates
- PowerConnect W-6000 M3:10,100,1000,10000 Mbit/s
- Avocent 4-Port ACS800 Serial Console with external AC/DC Power Brick - Global Datacenter PDU Power Cord:10,100,1000 Mbit/s
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports
- PowerConnect W-6000 M3:12
- Avocent 4-Port ACS800 Serial Console with external AC/DC Power Brick - Global Datacenter PDU Power Cord:2
Console port
- PowerConnect W-6000 M3:RS-232
- Avocent 4-Port ACS800 Serial Console with external AC/DC Power Brick - Global Datacenter PDU Power Cord:RJ-45

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of PowerConnect W-6000 M3, ACS804EAC-400
26 specifications	A Dell PowerConnect W-6000 M3 View product	B Vertiv Avocent 4-Port ACS800 Serial Console with external AC/DC Power Brick - Global Datacenter PDU Power Cord Model ACS804EAC-400 View product
Network1 differ
Ethernet LAN data ratesDiffers	10,100,1000,10000 Mbit/s	10,100,1000 Mbit/s
Wi-FiKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Networking standardsKnown for one	IEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.3u	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces2 differ
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsDiffers	12	2
Console portDiffers	RS-232	RJ-45
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4
Serial ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4
Poweridentical
AC input voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100 - 240 V
AC input frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	50 - 60 Hz
Designidentical
Product colourKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Black
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	FCC Class A CE Class A (EU) ICES-003 (Canada) VCCI (Japan) RCM (Australia) Customs Union (CU) KCC (Korea) UL (USA) cUL (Canada) EN-60950 (EU) CB Customs Union (CU)
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	20 - 80%
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0 - 70 °C
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 - 95%
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-20 - 90 °C
Weight & dimensionsidentical
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	211.84 x 181.76 x 29.49 mm
WeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.09 kg
Performanceidentical
Number of Remote Access Points (max)Known for one	1024	Unknown — not stated by the source
MAC address tableKnown for one	64000 entries	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of usersKnown for one	8192 user(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Concurrent IPSec tunnelsKnown for one	4096	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of VLANsKnown for one	1400	Unknown — not stated by the source
Management featuresidentical
VLAN supportKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Securityidentical
Security algorithmsKnown for one	3DES	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network management device comparisons

All network management device comparisons