All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 network management devices

Dell PowerConnect W-6000 M3 vs NETGEAR WB7630 network management device Ethernet LAN Wi-Fi

Add a product
  • 10specifications compared
  • 8differ
  • 2identical
  • 30known for one product only

Key differences

The Dell PowerConnect W-6000 M3 has 1,336 more VLANs than the NETGEAR WB7630 network management device Ethernet LAN Wi-Fi (1400 vs 64). The Dell PowerConnect W-6000 M3 has 8 more Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports than the NETGEAR WB7630 network management device Ethernet LAN Wi-Fi (12 vs 4). Number of users: 8192 user(s) on the Dell PowerConnect W-6000 M3, 50 user(s) on the NETGEAR WB7630 network management device Ethernet LAN Wi-Fi. Ethernet LAN data rates: 10,100,1000,10000 Mbit/s on the Dell PowerConnect W-6000 M3, 10,100,1000 Mbit/s on the NETGEAR WB7630 network management device Ethernet LAN Wi-Fi. Security algorithms: 3DES on the Dell PowerConnect W-6000 M3, WEP, WPA, WPA-PSK, WPA2, WPA2-PSK on the NETGEAR WB7630 network management device Ethernet LAN Wi-Fi.

  • Number of users
    • 8192 user(s)
    • 50 user(s)
  • Number of VLANs
    • 1400
    • 64
  • Ethernet LAN data rates
    • 10,100,1000,10000 Mbit/s
    • 10,100,1000 Mbit/s
  • Connectivity technology
    • Wired
    • Wired & Wireless
  • Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports
    • 12
    • 4
  • Console port
    • RS-232
    • VGA

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
40 specifications
A

Dell

PowerConnect W-6000 M3View product
B

NETGEAR

WB7630 network management device Ethernet LAN Wi-Fi

Model WB7630

View product
Performance2 differ
Number of usersDiffers8192 user(s)50 user(s)
Number of VLANsDiffers140064
Number of Remote Access Points (max)Known for one1024
MAC address tableKnown for one64000 entries
Concurrent IPSec tunnelsKnown for one4096
Network2 differ
Ethernet LANYesYes
Ethernet LAN data ratesDiffers10,100,1000,10000 Mbit/s10,100,1000 Mbit/s
Networking standardsDiffersIEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.3uIEEE 802.11e, IEEE 802.11i, IEEE 802.1Q, IEEE 802.1x, IEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.3u
Wi-FiKnown for oneYes
Wi-Fi standardsKnown for one802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g
Management featuresidentical
Web-based managementKnown for oneYes
DHCP serverKnown for oneYes
Access Control List (ACL)Known for oneYes
Captive portalKnown for oneYes
VLAN supportYesYes
Security1 differ
Security algorithmsDiffers3DESWEP, WPA, WPA-PSK, WPA2, WPA2-PSK
Ports & interfaces3 differ
Connectivity technologyDiffersWiredWired & Wireless
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsDiffers124
Console portDiffersRS-232VGA
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one2
AC (power) inKnown for oneYes
Poweridentical
AC input voltageKnown for one100-240 V
AC input frequencyKnown for one50 - 60 Hz
Input currentKnown for one8 A
Power consumption (typical)Known for one13 W
Antennaidentical
Antenna typeKnown for oneInternal
Designidentical
Rack mountingKnown for oneYes
Rack capacityKnown for one1U
Product colourKnown for oneBlack
Power LEDKnown for oneYes
LED indicatorsKnown for onePower, Status
CertificationKnown for oneFCC, CE, WEEE, RoHS
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one10 - 90%
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one0 - 45 °C
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one5 - 95%
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-20 - 70 °C
Weight & dimensionsidentical
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one440 x 43 x 262 mm
WeightKnown for one3.6 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for oneAC, LAN (RJ-45)
User guideKnown for oneYes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network management device comparisons

All network management device comparisons