Product comparison · 2 network management devices

APC NetBotz Rack Monitor 570 vs Zyxel MSC1240XA network management device Ethernet LAN

8specifications compared
5differ
3identical
15known for one product only

Key differences

The APC NetBotz Rack Monitor 570 has 0.54 kg more weight than the Zyxel MSC1240XA network management device Ethernet LAN (1.74 kg vs 1.2 kg). Ethernet LAN data rates: 10,100 Mbit/s on the APC NetBotz Rack Monitor 570, 10,100,1000,10000 Mbit/s on the Zyxel MSC1240XA network management device Ethernet LAN. Operating relative humidity (H-H): 0 - 95% on the APC NetBotz Rack Monitor 570, -40 - 70% on the Zyxel MSC1240XA network management device Ethernet LAN. Operating temperature (T-T): 0 - 40 °C on the APC NetBotz Rack Monitor 570, -40 - 65 °C on the Zyxel MSC1240XA network management device Ethernet LAN.

Ethernet LAN data rates
- NetBotz Rack Monitor 570:10,100 Mbit/s
- MSC1240XA network management device Ethernet LAN:10,100,1000,10000 Mbit/s
Operating relative humidity (H-H)
- NetBotz Rack Monitor 570:0 - 95%
- MSC1240XA network management device Ethernet LAN:-40 - 70%
Operating temperature (T-T)
- NetBotz Rack Monitor 570:0 - 40 °C
- MSC1240XA network management device Ethernet LAN:-40 - 65 °C
Weight
- NetBotz Rack Monitor 570:1.74 kg
- MSC1240XA network management device Ethernet LAN:1.2 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of NetBotz Rack Monitor 570, MSC1240XA
23 specifications	A APC NetBotz Rack Monitor 570 View product	B Zyxel MSC1240XA network management device Ethernet LAN Model MSC1240XA View product
Network1 differ
Ethernet LAN data ratesDiffers	10,100 Mbit/s	10,100,1000,10000 Mbit/s
Networking standardsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	IEEE 802.1Q, IEEE 802.1ad, IEEE 802.1p
Cabling technologyKnown for one	10/100 Base-T	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
Console portKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	RJ-11
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one	5	Unknown — not stated by the source
AC (power) inKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	87 W
Power over Ethernet (PoE)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Design1 differ
Product colourKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Black
CertificationDiffers	AS / NZS 3548 (C-Tick) Class A, cUL Listed, CE, FCC Part 15 Class A, GOST, ICES-003, IRAM, Low Voltage Directive 2006/95/EC, NOM, UL Listed, VCCI Class A, VDE	EN60950-1 IEC60950-1 EN55022 A EN55024 A ETSI 300 386 V1.6.1 ITU-T K.20
Operational conditions2 differ
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs	0 - 95%	-40 - 70%
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs	0 - 40 °C	-40 - 65 °C
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 - 95%
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 - 95 °C
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers	1.74 kg	1.2 kg
WidthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	391 mm
DepthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	258 mm
HeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	25 mm
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	93 x 43.5 x 432 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Management featuresidentical
DHCP serverKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network management device comparisons

All network management device comparisons