Product comparison · 2 network extenders

TP-Link BE11000 Network transmitter & receiver White 2500 Mbit/s vs TP-Link RE650(EU) network extender Network transmitter White 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s

Add a product
  • 30specifications compared
  • 14differ
  • 16identical
  • 19known for one product only

Key differences

The TP-Link BE11000 Network transmitter & receiver White 2500 Mbit/s has 9,067 Mbit/s more data transfer rate than the TP-Link RE650(EU) network extender Network transmitter White 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s (10800 Mbit/s vs 1733 Mbit/s). The TP-Link RE650(EU) network extender Network transmitter White 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s has 55.8 mm more width than the TP-Link BE11000 Network transmitter & receiver White 2500 Mbit/s (163 mm vs 107.2 mm). The TP-Link RE650(EU) network extender Network transmitter White 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s has 47 mm more depth than the TP-Link BE11000 Network transmitter & receiver White 2500 Mbit/s (86 mm vs 39 mm). Type: Network transmitter & receiver on the TP-Link BE11000 Network transmitter & receiver White 2500 Mbit/s, Network transmitter on the TP-Link RE650(EU) network extender Network transmitter White 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s. Ethernet LAN data rates: 2500 Mbit/s on the TP-Link BE11000 Network transmitter & receiver White 2500 Mbit/s, 10,100,1000 Mbit/s on the TP-Link RE650(EU) network extender Network transmitter White 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s.

  • Data transfer rate
    • BE11000 Network transmitter & receiver White 2500 Mbit/s:10800 Mbit/s
    • RE650(EU) network extender Network transmitter White 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:1733 Mbit/s
  • Ethernet LAN data rates
    • BE11000 Network transmitter & receiver White 2500 Mbit/s:2500 Mbit/s
    • RE650(EU) network extender Network transmitter White 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:10,100,1000 Mbit/s
  • Mac operating systems supported
    • BE11000 Network transmitter & receiver White 2500 Mbit/s:MacOS
    • RE650(EU) network extender Network transmitter White 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:Yes
  • AC input voltage
    • BE11000 Network transmitter & receiver White 2500 Mbit/s:100-240 V
    • RE650(EU) network extender Network transmitter White 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:100 - 240 V
  • Width
    • BE11000 Network transmitter & receiver White 2500 Mbit/s:107.2 mm
    • RE650(EU) network extender Network transmitter White 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:163 mm
  • Depth
    • BE11000 Network transmitter & receiver White 2500 Mbit/s:39 mm
    • RE650(EU) network extender Network transmitter White 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:86 mm
  • Height
    • BE11000 Network transmitter & receiver White 2500 Mbit/s:161 mm
    • RE650(EU) network extender Network transmitter White 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:40 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of BE11000, RE650(EU)
49 specifications
Performance6 differ
TypeDiffersNetwork transmitter & receiverNetwork transmitter
Data transfer rateDiffers10800 Mbit/s1733 Mbit/s
Ethernet LAN data ratesDiffers2500 Mbit/s10,100,1000 Mbit/s
Windows operating systems supportedDiffersWindows 10, Windows 2000, Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows 98SE, Windows NT, Windows Vista, Windows XPWindows 10 Education, Windows 10 Education x64, Windows 10 Enterprise, Windows 10 Enterprise x64, Windows 10 Home, Windows 10 Home x64, Windows 10 IOT Core, Windows 10 Pro, Windows 10 Pro x64, Windows 2000, Windows 2000 Professional, Windows 7 Enterprise, Windows 7 Enterprise x64, Windows 7 Home Bas
Mac compatibilityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Mac operating systems supportedDiffersMacOSYes
Browser supportedDiffersInternet Explorer 11, Firefox 12.0, Chrome 20.0, Safari 4.0, or other Java-enabled browserInternet Explorer 11, Firefox 12.0, Chrome 20.0, Safari 4.0
Antennaidentical
Transmitting power (CE)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.4 GHz ≤20dBm, 5 GHz ≤23dBm
Transmitting power (FCC)Known for one30 dBmUnknown — not stated by the source
Network3 differ
Cabling technologyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10/100/1000Base-T(X)
Networking standardsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceIEEE 802.11a, IEEE 802.11ac, IEEE 802.11b, IEEE 802.11g, IEEE 802.11n
Wi-Fi standardsDiffers802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be)802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
Wi-Fi bandDiffersTri-band (2.4 GHz / 5 GHz / 6 GHz)Dual-band (2.4 GHz / 5 GHz)
Wi-Fi data rate (max)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1733 Mbit/s
Security algorithmsDiffersWPA, WPA2-PSK, WPA364-bit WEP, 128-bit WEP, WPA-PSK, WPA2-PSK
BandwidthKnown for one0.32 GHzUnknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
LED indicatorsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
CertificationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCE
Power1 differ
AC input voltageDiffers100-240 V100 - 240 V
Power consumption (max)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source12 W
Input currentKnown for one0.5 AUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (typical)Known for one23.5 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Power plug typeKnown for oneType BUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers107.2 mm163 mm
DepthDiffers39 mm86 mm
HeightDiffers161 mm40 mm
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source202 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source125 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source97 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source610 g
Certificates1 differ
Compliance certificatesDiffersCE, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), RoHS, UKCACE, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), RoHS
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source85176990
Featuresidentical
Networking featuresKnown for oneMulti-Link Operation (MLO), 320 MHz Channel, 4K-QAM, Multi-RUsUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network extender comparisons

All network extender comparisons