Product comparison · 2 network extenders

TP-Link BE11000 Network transmitter & receiver White 2500 Mbit/s vs TP-Link RE500X network extender Network transmitter & receiver White 1000 Mbit/s

30specifications compared
15differ
15identical
18known for one product only

Key differences

The TP-Link BE11000 Network transmitter & receiver White 2500 Mbit/s has 9,600 Mbit/s more data transfer rate than the TP-Link RE500X network extender Network transmitter & receiver White 1000 Mbit/s (10800 Mbit/s vs 1200 Mbit/s). The TP-Link BE11000 Network transmitter & receiver White 2500 Mbit/s has 1,500 Mbit/s more Ethernet LAN data rates than the TP-Link RE500X network extender Network transmitter & receiver White 1000 Mbit/s (2500 Mbit/s vs 1000 Mbit/s). The TP-Link BE11000 Network transmitter & receiver White 2500 Mbit/s has 2 more antennas quantity than the TP-Link RE500X network extender Network transmitter & receiver White 1000 Mbit/s (4 vs 2). Mac operating systems supported: MacOS on the TP-Link BE11000 Network transmitter & receiver White 2500 Mbit/s, Yes on the TP-Link RE500X network extender Network transmitter & receiver White 1000 Mbit/s. Antenna type: External on the TP-Link BE11000 Network transmitter & receiver White 2500 Mbit/s, Internal on the TP-Link RE500X network extender Network transmitter & receiver White 1000 Mbit/s.

Data transfer rate
- BE11000 Network transmitter & receiver White 2500 Mbit/s:10800 Mbit/s
- RE500X network extender Network transmitter & receiver White 1000 Mbit/s:1200 Mbit/s
Ethernet LAN data rates
- BE11000 Network transmitter & receiver White 2500 Mbit/s:2500 Mbit/s
- RE500X network extender Network transmitter & receiver White 1000 Mbit/s:1000 Mbit/s
Mac operating systems supported
- BE11000 Network transmitter & receiver White 2500 Mbit/s:MacOS
- RE500X network extender Network transmitter & receiver White 1000 Mbit/s:Yes
Antennas quantity
- BE11000 Network transmitter & receiver White 2500 Mbit/s:4
- RE500X network extender Network transmitter & receiver White 1000 Mbit/s:2
Antenna type
- BE11000 Network transmitter & receiver White 2500 Mbit/s:External
- RE500X network extender Network transmitter & receiver White 1000 Mbit/s:Internal
AC input voltage
- BE11000 Network transmitter & receiver White 2500 Mbit/s:100-240 V
- RE500X network extender Network transmitter & receiver White 1000 Mbit/s:100 - 240 V
Width
- BE11000 Network transmitter & receiver White 2500 Mbit/s:107.2 mm
- RE500X network extender Network transmitter & receiver White 1000 Mbit/s:78 mm
Depth
- BE11000 Network transmitter & receiver White 2500 Mbit/s:39 mm
- RE500X network extender Network transmitter & receiver White 1000 Mbit/s:36 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of BE11000, RE500X
48 specifications	A TP-Link BE11000 Network transmitter & receiver White 2500 Mbit/s Model BE11000 View product	B TP-Link RE500X network extender Network transmitter & receiver White 1000 Mbit/s Model RE500X View product
Performance5 differ
Data transfer rateDiffers	10800 Mbit/s	1200 Mbit/s
Ethernet LAN data ratesDiffers	2500 Mbit/s	1000 Mbit/s
Windows operating systems supportedDiffers	Windows 10, Windows 2000, Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows 98SE, Windows NT, Windows Vista, Windows XP	Windows 10, Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows 98SE, Windows NT, Windows Vista, Windows XP
Mac compatibilityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Mac operating systems supportedDiffers	MacOS	Yes
Browser supportedDiffers	Internet Explorer 11, Firefox 12.0, Chrome 20.0, Safari 4.0, or other Java-enabled browser	Internet Explorer 11, Firefox 12.0, Chrome 20.0, Safari 4.0
Antenna2 differ
Antennas quantityDiffers	4	2
Antenna typeDiffers	External	Internal
Transmitting power (CE)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2.4 GHz ≤20dBm, 5 GHz ≤30dBm
Transmitting power (FCC)Known for one	30 dBm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Network3 differ
Cabling technologyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10/100/1000Base-T(X)
Networking standardsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	IEEE 802.11a, IEEE 802.11ac, IEEE 802.11ax, IEEE 802.11b, IEEE 802.11g, IEEE 802.11n
Wi-Fi standardsDiffers	802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be)	802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)
Wi-Fi bandDiffers	Tri-band (2.4 GHz / 5 GHz / 6 GHz)	Dual-band (2.4 GHz / 5 GHz)
Wi-Fi data rate (max)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1200 Mbit/s
Security algorithmsDiffers	WPA, WPA2-PSK, WPA3	64-bit WEP, 128-bit WEP, WPA, WPA-PSK
BandwidthKnown for one	0.32 GHz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power1 differ
AC input voltageDiffers	100-240 V	100 - 240 V
Power consumption (max)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 W
Input currentKnown for one	0.5 A	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	23.5 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power plug typeKnown for one	Type B	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers	107.2 mm	78 mm
DepthDiffers	39 mm	36 mm
HeightDiffers	161 mm	149 mm
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	202 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	125 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	97 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	350 g
Certificates1 differ
Compliance certificatesDiffers	CE, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), RoHS, UKCA	CE, RoHS
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	85176990
Featuresidentical
Networking featuresKnown for one	Multi-Link Operation (MLO), 320 MHz Channel, 4K-QAM, Multi-RUs	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network extender comparisons

All network extender comparisons