Product comparison · 2 network extenders

D-Link AC1900 Mesh Wi-Fi Range Extender, White vs TP-Link ME1500X network extender White 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s

9specifications compared
6differ
3identical
21known for one product only

Key differences

The D-Link AC1900 Mesh Wi-Fi Range Extender, White has 3 more Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports than the TP-Link ME1500X network extender White 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s (4 vs 1). The D-Link AC1900 Mesh Wi-Fi Range Extender, White has 15.3 mm more width than the TP-Link ME1500X network extender White 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s (100 mm vs 84.7 mm). The D-Link AC1900 Mesh Wi-Fi Range Extender, White has 61 mm more depth than the TP-Link ME1500X network extender White 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s (100 mm vs 39 mm). LED indicators: Power, Status on the D-Link AC1900 Mesh Wi-Fi Range Extender, White, Yes on the TP-Link ME1500X network extender White 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s.

Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports
- AC1900 Mesh Wi-Fi Range Extender, White:4
- ME1500X network extender White 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:1
LED indicators
- AC1900 Mesh Wi-Fi Range Extender, White:Power, Status
- ME1500X network extender White 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:Yes
Width
- AC1900 Mesh Wi-Fi Range Extender, White:100 mm
- ME1500X network extender White 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:84.7 mm
Depth
- AC1900 Mesh Wi-Fi Range Extender, White:100 mm
- ME1500X network extender White 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:39 mm
Height
- AC1900 Mesh Wi-Fi Range Extender, White:181 mm
- ME1500X network extender White 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:112 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of DAP-1900, ME1500X
30 specifications	A D-Link AC1900 Mesh Wi-Fi Range Extender, White Model DAP-1900 View product	B TP-Link ME1500X network extender White 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s Model ME1500X View product
Performanceidentical
Ethernet LAN data rates	10,100,1000 Mbit/s	10,100,1000 Mbit/s
Network1 differ
Wi-Fi	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standardsDiffers	802.11b, 802.11g, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)	802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)
Wi-Fi bandKnown for one	Dual-band (2.4 GHz / 5 GHz)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Wi-Fi data rate (max)Known for one	1900 Mbit/s	Unknown — not stated by the source
Security algorithmsKnown for one	WPA, WPA2, WPA3, WPS	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsDiffers	4	1
Design1 differ
Product colour	White	White
LED indicatorsDiffers	Power, Status	Yes
Quantity per packKnown for one	1 pc(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Country of originKnown for one	Australia	Unknown — not stated by the source
CertificationKnown for one	FCC, IC, CE, UL, CB, RCM	Unknown — not stated by the source
Reset buttonKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Poweridentical
AC input voltageKnown for one	220 - 240 V	Unknown — not stated by the source
AC input frequencyKnown for one	60 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Output voltageKnown for one	12 V	Unknown — not stated by the source
Output currentKnown for one	1.5 A	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power plug typeKnown for one	Type I	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	0 - 40 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	-20 - 65 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	10 - 90%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	5 - 95%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers	100 mm	84.7 mm
DepthDiffers	100 mm	39 mm
HeightDiffers	181 mm	112 mm
WeightKnown for one	408 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	150 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one	160 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one	200 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one	251 g	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network extender comparisons

All network extender comparisons