Product comparison · 2 network extenders

ATEN UCE33100 network extender Network transmitter & receiver Black vs TP-Link RE900XD network extender Network transmitter White 10, 100, 1000, 2500 Mbit/s

9specifications compared
7differ
2identical
30known for one product only

Key differences

The TP-Link RE900XD network extender Network transmitter White 10, 100, 1000, 2500 Mbit/s has 6.56 W more power consumption (typical) than the ATEN UCE33100 network extender Network transmitter & receiver Black (9.2 W vs 2.64 W). The TP-Link RE900XD network extender Network transmitter White 10, 100, 1000, 2500 Mbit/s has 104 mm more width than the ATEN UCE33100 network extender Network transmitter & receiver Black (189 mm vs 85 mm). The ATEN UCE33100 network extender Network transmitter & receiver Black has 48.5 mm more depth than the TP-Link RE900XD network extender Network transmitter White 10, 100, 1000, 2500 Mbit/s (107.5 mm vs 59 mm). Type: Network transmitter & receiver on the ATEN UCE33100 network extender Network transmitter & receiver Black, Network transmitter on the TP-Link RE900XD network extender Network transmitter White 10, 100, 1000, 2500 Mbit/s. Product colour: Black on the ATEN UCE33100 network extender Network transmitter & receiver Black, White on the TP-Link RE900XD network extender Network transmitter White 10, 100, 1000, 2500 Mbit/s.

Product colour
- UCE33100 network extender Network transmitter & receiver Black:Black
- RE900XD network extender Network transmitter White 10, 100, 1000, 2500 Mbit/s:White
Power consumption (typical)
- UCE33100 network extender Network transmitter & receiver Black:2.64 W
- RE900XD network extender Network transmitter White 10, 100, 1000, 2500 Mbit/s:9.2 W
Storage temperature (T-T)
- UCE33100 network extender Network transmitter & receiver Black:-20 - 60 °C
- RE900XD network extender Network transmitter White 10, 100, 1000, 2500 Mbit/s:-40 - 70 °C
Width
- UCE33100 network extender Network transmitter & receiver Black:85 mm
- RE900XD network extender Network transmitter White 10, 100, 1000, 2500 Mbit/s:189 mm
Depth
- UCE33100 network extender Network transmitter & receiver Black:107.5 mm
- RE900XD network extender Network transmitter White 10, 100, 1000, 2500 Mbit/s:59 mm
Height
- UCE33100 network extender Network transmitter & receiver Black:25.5 mm
- RE900XD network extender Network transmitter White 10, 100, 1000, 2500 Mbit/s:200 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of UCE33100, RE900XD
39 specifications	A ATEN UCE33100 network extender Network transmitter & receiver Black Model UCE33100 View product	B TP-Link RE900XD network extender Network transmitter White 10, 100, 1000, 2500 Mbit/s Model RE900XD View product
Performance1 differ
TypeDiffers	Network transmitter & receiver	Network transmitter
Ethernet LAN data ratesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10,100,1000,2500 Mbit/s
WPS push buttonKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Mac compatibilityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Browser supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Internet Explorer 11, Firefox 12.0, Chrome 20.0, Safari 4.0
Maximum transfer distanceKnown for one	100 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cable types supportedKnown for one	Cat6a	Unknown — not stated by the source
Antennaidentical
Antenna typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Internal
Networkidentical
Cabling technologyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10/100/1000Base-T(X)
Networking standardsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	IEEE 802.11a, IEEE 802.11ac, IEEE 802.11ax, IEEE 802.11b, IEEE 802.11g, IEEE 802.11n, IEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.3u
Security algorithmsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	WPA, WPA2-PSK, WPA3, WPS
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffers	Black	White
LED indicators	Yes	Yes
Reset buttonKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Housing materialKnown for one	Metal	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
AC input voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100 - 240 V
AC input frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	50 / 60 Hz
Power consumption (max)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	18 W
Power consumption (typical)Differs	2.64 W	9.2 W
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)	0 - 40 °C	0 - 40 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Differs	-20 - 60 °C	-40 - 70 °C
Operating temperature (transmitter)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 - 90 °C
Storage temperature (transmitter)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 - 90 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	20 - 90%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers	85 mm	189 mm
DepthDiffers	107.5 mm	59 mm
HeightDiffers	25.5 mm	200 mm
WeightKnown for one	260 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Quick start guideKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability complianceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Certificatesidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Federal Communications Commission (FCC), RoHS
Ports & interfacesidentical
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source
RJ-45 ports quantity (transmitter)Known for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB Type-C ports quantity (transmitter)Known for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB Type-C ports quantity (receiver)Known for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantityKnown for one	4	Unknown — not stated by the source
DC-in jackKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network extender comparisons

All network extender comparisons