Product comparison · 2 network equipment chassis

Allied Telesis MMCR18 network equipment chassis vs Dell 210-AETR network equipment chassis 1U Black

11specifications compared
11differ
0identical
20known for one product only

Key differences

Number of slots
- MMCR18 network equipment chassis:18
- 210-AETR network equipment chassis 1U Black:10
Certification
- MMCR18 network equipment chassis:FCC Class A, IC Class A
- 210-AETR network equipment chassis 1U Black:USGv6, IPv6 Ready, UC APL
Operating relative humidity (H-H)
- MMCR18 network equipment chassis:5 - 80%
- 210-AETR network equipment chassis 1U Black:5 - 85%
Operating temperature (T-T)
- MMCR18 network equipment chassis:0 - 50 °C
- 210-AETR network equipment chassis 1U Black:0 - 45 °C
Storage relative humidity (H-H)
- MMCR18 network equipment chassis:5 - 80%
- 210-AETR network equipment chassis 1U Black:5 - 95%
Storage temperature (T-T)
- MMCR18 network equipment chassis:-20 - 70 °C
- 210-AETR network equipment chassis 1U Black:-40 - 70 °C
Depth
- MMCR18 network equipment chassis:255 mm
- 210-AETR network equipment chassis 1U Black:457 mm
Height
- MMCR18 network equipment chassis:87 mm
- 210-AETR network equipment chassis 1U Black:352.6 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of MMCR18, 210-AETR
31 specifications	A Allied Telesis MMCR18 network equipment chassis Model MMCR18 View product	B Dell 210-AETR network equipment chassis 1U Black Model 210-AETR View product
Technical details1 differ
Rack capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1U
Frame typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Open frame
Compliance certificatesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	RoHS
Heat dissipationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10.066 BTU/h
MAC address tableKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	160000 entries
Number of fansKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3 fan(s)
Number of slotsDiffers	18	10
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	32 - 113 °F
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2400 W
Product colourKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Black
Supported protocolsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	IPv4, IPv6
Switching capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2560 Gbit/s
ThroughputKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Line Card 714 Mpps
Rack mountingKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
MaterialKnown for one	Metal	Unknown — not stated by the source
Certificates2 differ
CertificationDiffers	FCC Class A, IC Class A	USGv6, IPv6 Ready, UC APL
SafetyDiffers	UL, CSA, TUV, IEC 825-1, CE compliant	UL/CSA 60950-1, Second Edition, EN 60950-1, Second Edition, IEC 60950-1, Second Edition Including All, National Deviations and Group Differences, EN 60825-1 Safety of Laser Products, Part 1: Equipment Classification Requirements and User’s Guide, EN 60825-2 Safety of Laser Products, Part 2: Safety o
Operational conditions4 differ
Operating altitudeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0 - 10000 m
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs	5 - 80%	5 - 85%
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs	0 - 50 °C	0 - 45 °C
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Differs	5 - 80%	5 - 95%
Storage temperature (T-T)Differs	-20 - 70 °C	-40 - 70 °C
Poweridentical
AC input voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100 - 240 V
Input currentKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	16 A
Number of power supply unitsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Weight & dimensions4 differ
DepthDiffers	255 mm	457 mm
HeightDiffers	87 mm	352.6 mm
WeightDiffers	4.3 kg	25.2 kg
WidthDiffers	440 mm	442 mm
Packaging dataidentical
ManualKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network equipment chassis comparisons

All network equipment chassis comparisons