Product comparison · 2 network cards

Linksys Telephone Adapter with 1 FXS & 1 FXO Port vs Trust FireWire DV PCI Kit VI-2100 (FireWire Video PCI Kit DV411P)

5specifications compared
4differ
1identical
21known for one product only

Key differences

The Trust FireWire DV PCI Kit VI-2100 (FireWire Video PCI Kit DV411P) has 19.1 mm more width than the Linksys Telephone Adapter with 1 FXS & 1 FXO Port (122 mm vs 102.9 mm). The Trust FireWire DV PCI Kit VI-2100 (FireWire Video PCI Kit DV411P) has 38.8 mm more depth than the Linksys Telephone Adapter with 1 FXS & 1 FXO Port (134 mm vs 95.2 mm). The Linksys Telephone Adapter with 1 FXS & 1 FXO Port has 5.9 mm more height than the Trust FireWire DV PCI Kit VI-2100 (FireWire Video PCI Kit DV411P) (27.9 mm vs 22 mm). Host interface: RJ-45 on the Linksys Telephone Adapter with 1 FXS & 1 FXO Port, PCI on the Trust FireWire DV PCI Kit VI-2100 (FireWire Video PCI Kit DV411P).

Host interface
- Telephone Adapter with 1 FXS & 1 FXO Port:RJ-45
- FireWire DV PCI Kit VI-2100 (FireWire Video PCI Kit DV411P):PCI
Width
- Telephone Adapter with 1 FXS & 1 FXO Port:102.9 mm
- FireWire DV PCI Kit VI-2100 (FireWire Video PCI Kit DV411P):122 mm
Depth
- Telephone Adapter with 1 FXS & 1 FXO Port:95.2 mm
- FireWire DV PCI Kit VI-2100 (FireWire Video PCI Kit DV411P):134 mm
Height
- Telephone Adapter with 1 FXS & 1 FXO Port:27.9 mm
- FireWire DV PCI Kit VI-2100 (FireWire Video PCI Kit DV411P):22 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Telephone Adapter with 1 FXS & 1 FXO Port, FireWire DV PCI Kit VI-2100 (FireWire Video PCI Kit DV411P)
26 specifications	A Linksys Telephone Adapter with 1 FXS & 1 FXO Port View product	B Trust FireWire DV PCI Kit VI-2100 (FireWire Video PCI Kit DV411P)View product
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Host interfaceDiffers	RJ-45	PCI
Networkidentical
Maximum data transfer rateKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	400 Mbit/s
Data link protocolsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	IEEE 1394A
Designidentical
Component forKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	PC
Form factorKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Internal
Plug and PlayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Poweridentical
USB poweredKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	5 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
System requirementsidentical
Minimum storage drive spaceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	500 MB
Compatible operating systemsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Windows 98SE, ME, 2000, XP.
Minimum processorKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Pentium 500 MHz
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers	102.9 mm	122 mm
DepthDiffers	95.2 mm	134 mm
HeightDiffers	27.9 mm	22 mm
WeightKnown for one	975 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Minimum system requirementsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	PCI slot, CD-ROM.
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	122 x 134 x 22 mm
Internal memoryKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	128 MB
Ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3
Power requirementsKnown for one	100-240v - 50-60Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
I/O portsKnown for one	1 x 10baseT RJ-45 Ethernet (IEEE 802.3); 1 x RJ-11 FXS Phone - For Analog Circuit Telephone Device (Tip/Ring); 1 x RJ-11 FXO Phone - For a Telco / PBX Connection;	Unknown — not stated by the source
Non-operating relative humidity (non-condensing)Known for one	10 - 90%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	0 - 45 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	-25 - 85 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	10 - 90%	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network card comparisons

All network card comparisons