Product comparison · 2 network cards

HP NC3132 Internal Ethernet 100 Mbit/s vs Zyxel MiniGBIC-ZX-80 1250 Mbit/s

10specifications compared
8differ
2identical
24known for one product only

Key differences

Host interface
- NC3132 Internal Ethernet 100 Mbit/s:PCI
- MiniGBIC-ZX-80 1250 Mbit/s:RJ-45
Maximum data transfer rate
- NC3132 Internal Ethernet 100 Mbit/s:100 Mbit/s
- MiniGBIC-ZX-80 1250 Mbit/s:1250 Mbit/s
Power consumption
- NC3132 Internal Ethernet 100 Mbit/s:800 mA
- MiniGBIC-ZX-80 1250 Mbit/s:300 mA
Operating temperature (T-T)
- NC3132 Internal Ethernet 100 Mbit/s:0 - 55 °C
- MiniGBIC-ZX-80 1250 Mbit/s:0 - 70 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)
- NC3132 Internal Ethernet 100 Mbit/s:-65 - 85 °C
- MiniGBIC-ZX-80 1250 Mbit/s:-40 - 85 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)
- NC3132 Internal Ethernet 100 Mbit/s:10 - 95%
- MiniGBIC-ZX-80 1250 Mbit/s:5 - 95%
Compliance industry standards
- NC3132 Internal Ethernet 100 Mbit/s:IEEE 802.2, 802.3, 802.3u
- MiniGBIC-ZX-80 1250 Mbit/s:IEEE 802.3ah
Cable type
- NC3132 Internal Ethernet 100 Mbit/s:CAT 3, 4, 5 UTP
- MiniGBIC-ZX-80 1250 Mbit/s:Single-Mode Fiber

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of NC3132, MiniGBIC-ZX-80
34 specifications	A HP NC3132 Internal Ethernet 100 Mbit/s Model NC3132 View product	B Zyxel MiniGBIC-ZX-80 1250 Mbit/s Model MiniGBIC-ZX-80 View product
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Connectivity technology	Wired	Wired
Host interfaceDiffers	PCI	RJ-45
InterfaceKnown for one	Ethernet	Unknown — not stated by the source
Network1 differ
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers	100 Mbit/s	1250 Mbit/s
Ethernet LANKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Full duplexKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Web-based managementKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum operating distanceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	80000 m
Designidentical
InternalKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
ChipsetKnown for one	Intel® 82559	Unknown — not stated by the source
Plug and PlayKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
CertificationKnown for one	FCC Class A & B, CE Mark	Unknown — not stated by the source
Product colourKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Stainless steel
Form factorKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	MiniGBIC-Modul
SafetyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Class 1 Laser, 21 CFR 1040.10/1040.11, CSA, TUV
Power1 differ
Output voltageKnown for one	5 V	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumptionDiffers	800 mA	300 mA
System requirementsidentical
Compatible operating systemsKnown for one	Windows 2000 Windows NT 3.51, 4.0 Novell NetWare 3x, 4x, 5.x SCO UnixWare 2.1 SCO UnixWare 7.x SCO OpenServer 5.x NetWare DOS MS DOS IBM OS/2 Warp Server Linux	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditions3 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs	0 - 55 °C	0 - 70 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Differs	-65 - 85 °C	-40 - 85 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs	10 - 95%	5 - 95%
Other features2 differ
Compliance industry standardsDiffers	IEEE 802.2, 802.3, 802.3u	IEEE 802.3ah
Cable typeDiffers	CAT 3, 4, 5 UTP	Single-Mode Fiber
Flow control supportKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Link/Act LEDKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports quantity	2	2
I/O portsKnown for one	2x RJ-45	Unknown — not stated by the source
Connector(s)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	LC
Data transfer rateKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.25 Gbit/s
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	56 x 13.4 x 12.4 mm
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	56 mm
DepthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	13.4 mm
HeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	12.4 mm
WeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	160 g

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network card comparisons

All network card comparisons