Product comparison · 2 network cards

Hama FireWire 400/800 PC Card vs Hama Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter Version 2.0+EDR Class1

Key differences

Host interface
- FireWire 400/800 PC Card:PCI
- Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter Version 2.0+EDR Class1:USB
Maximum data transfer rate
- FireWire 400/800 PC Card:800 Mbit/s
- Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter Version 2.0+EDR Class1:480 Mbit/s

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of FireWire 400/800 PC Card, Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter Version 2.0+EDR Class1
14 specifications	A Hama FireWire 400/800 PC Card View product	B Hama Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter Version 2.0+EDR Class1 View product
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Connectivity technology	Wireless	Wireless
Host interfaceDiffers	PCI	USB
Network1 differ
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers	800 Mbit/s	480 Mbit/s
Maximum operating distanceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100 m
Bluetooth versionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2.0+EDR
Designidentical
Product colourKnown for one	Multicolour	Unknown — not stated by the source
Plug and PlayKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
InternalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
System requirements1 differ
Compatible operating systemsDiffers	Windows 2000/XP	Windows 2000/XP/XP x64 Edition/Vista 32-Bit/64-Bit
Other featuresidentical
Compliance industry standardsKnown for one	IEEE 1394b/IEEE 1394a	Unknown — not stated by the source
Supported data transfer ratesKnown for one	400/800 Mbit	Unknown — not stated by the source
I/O portsKnown for one	2x IEEE 1394b 1x IEEE 1394a	Unknown — not stated by the source
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	23 x 13 x 4 mm
Poweridentical
USB poweredKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.