Product comparison · 2 network cards

Hama Bluetooth USB Adapter vs Hama USB Infrared Adapter

6specifications compared
3differ
3identical
3known for one product only

Key differences

Maximum data transfer rate
- Bluetooth USB Adapter:480, 3
- USB Infrared Adapter:0.115 Mbit/s
Maximum operating distance
- Bluetooth USB Adapter:40 m
- USB Infrared Adapter:1 m

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Bluetooth USB Adapter, USB Infrared Adapter
9 specifications	A Hama Bluetooth USB Adapter View product	B Hama USB Infrared Adapter View product
Ports & interfacesidentical
Connectivity technology	Wireless	Wireless
Host interface	USB	USB
Network2 differ
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers	480, 3	0.115 Mbit/s
Maximum operating distanceDiffers	40 m	1 m
Bluetooth versionKnown for one	2.0+EDR	Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Internal	No	No
Product colourKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Black
System requirements1 differ
Compatible operating systemsDiffers	Windows 2000/XP/XP x64 Edition/Vista 32-Bit/64-Bit	Windows 98SE/ME/2000/XP/Vista
Other featuresidentical
Link/Act LEDKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network card comparisons

All network card comparisons