Product comparison · 2 network cards

Hama Bluetooth 2.0 USB Adapter vs Hama Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter Version 2.0+EDR Class1

Add a product
  • 8specifications compared
  • 1differ
  • 7identical
  • 2known for one product only

Key differences

Maximum data transfer rate: 480, 3 on the Hama Bluetooth 2.0 USB Adapter, 480 Mbit/s on the Hama Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter Version 2.0+EDR Class1.

  • Maximum data transfer rate
    • Bluetooth 2.0 USB Adapter:480, 3
    • Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter Version 2.0+EDR Class1:480 Mbit/s

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of Bluetooth 2.0 USB Adapter, Nano Bluetooth USB Adapter Version 2.0+EDR Class1
10 specifications
Ports & interfacesidentical
Connectivity technologyWirelessWireless
Host interfaceUSBUSB
Network1 differ
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers480, 3480 Mbit/s
Maximum operating distance100 m100 m
Bluetooth version2.0+EDR2.0+EDR
Designidentical
InternalNoNo
Product colourKnown for oneBlueUnknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
USB poweredYesYes
System requirementsidentical
Compatible operating systemsWindows 2000/XP/XP x64 Edition/Vista 32-Bit/64-BitWindows 2000/XP/XP x64 Edition/Vista 32-Bit/64-Bit
Other featuresidentical
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source23 x 13 x 4 mm

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network card comparisons

All network card comparisons