Product comparison · 2 network cards

Dell Qlogic QLE220 FC4 PCIe Kit vs Hama Nano Bluetooth

8specifications compared
8differ
0identical
23known for one product only

Key differences

Connectivity technology
- Qlogic QLE220 FC4 PCIe Kit:Wired
- Nano Bluetooth:Wireless
Host interface
- Qlogic QLE220 FC4 PCIe Kit:PCI Express
- Nano Bluetooth:USB
Interface
- Qlogic QLE220 FC4 PCIe Kit:Ethernet
- Nano Bluetooth:Bluetooth
Maximum data transfer rate
- Qlogic QLE220 FC4 PCIe Kit:4240 Mbit/s
- Nano Bluetooth:480 Mbit/s
Internal
- Qlogic QLE220 FC4 PCIe Kit:Yes
- Nano Bluetooth:No
Product colour
- Qlogic QLE220 FC4 PCIe Kit:Blue, Silver
- Nano Bluetooth:Black
Data transfer rate
- Qlogic QLE220 FC4 PCIe Kit:4 Gbit/s
- Nano Bluetooth:0.03 Gbit/s

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Qlogic QLE220 FC4 PCIe Kit, Nano Bluetooth
31 specifications	A Dell Qlogic QLE220 FC4 PCIe Kit View product	B Hama Nano Bluetooth View product
Ports & interfaces3 differ
Connectivity technologyDiffers	Wired	Wireless
Host interfaceDiffers	PCI Express	USB
InterfaceDiffers	Ethernet	Bluetooth
Network1 differ
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers	4240 Mbit/s	480 Mbit/s
Networking standardsKnown for one	IEEE 802.3	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ethernet LANKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Wi-FiKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Full duplexKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Supported network protocolsKnown for one	SCSI-FCP/FCP-2	Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum operating distanceKnown for one	300 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
Bluetooth versionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2.1+EDR
Design2 differ
InternalDiffers	Yes	No
Product colourDiffers	Blue, Silver	Black
Form factorKnown for one	SFF	Unknown — not stated by the source
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
CertificationKnown for one	RoSH	Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Output voltageKnown for one	12 V	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	5 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
System requirements1 differ
Compatible operating systemsDiffers	Windows Server 2003 Windows 2000 Windows XP Professional (x32/64-bit) Mac OS X Red Hat AS 2.1, 3.0 SuSE SLES 8, 9 Solaris 10 x86	Win 2000, XP, Vista, 7
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for one	Windows 2000, Windows XP Professional, Windows XP Professional x64	Unknown — not stated by the source
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for one	RedHat EL Linux 3 U9, Solaris 10 U4, Solaris 10 U5	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	0 - 55 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	-20 - 70 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	10 - 90%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	5 - 95%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other features1 differ
Connector(s)Known for one	LC	Unknown — not stated by the source
Data transfer rateDiffers	4 Gbit/s	0.03 Gbit/s
Link/Act LEDKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	32 - 131 °F	Unknown — not stated by the source
Supported data transfer ratesKnown for one	2 Gbit/s	Unknown — not stated by the source
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	19 x 13 x 4 mm

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network card comparisons

All network card comparisons