Product comparison · 2 network cards

Conceptronic Bluetooth v2.1 USB 2.0 Nano Adapter vs Conceptronic Bluetooth v2.1 USB 2.0 Nano Adapter 200m

9specifications compared
1differ
8identical
4known for one product only

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Bluetooth v2.1 USB 2.0 Nano Adapter, CBT200NANO
13 specifications	A Conceptronic Bluetooth v2.1 USB 2.0 Nano Adapter View product	B Conceptronic Bluetooth v2.1 USB 2.0 Nano Adapter 200m Model CBT200NANO View product
Ports & interfacesidentical
Connectivity technology	Wireless	Wireless
Host interface	USB	USB
Networkidentical
Maximum operating distanceKnown for one	10 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
Bluetooth version	2.1+EDR	2.1+EDR
Maximum data transfer rateKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3 Mbit/s
Designidentical
InternalKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Product colourKnown for one	Black	Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
USB powered	Yes	Yes
System requirements1 differ
Compatible operating systemsDiffers	Windows 2000; Windows XP; Windows Vista; Windows 7	Windows 2000/XP/Vista/7
Weight & dimensionsidentical
Width	17 mm	17 mm
Depth	22 mm	22 mm
Height	7 mm	7 mm
Weight	3 g	3 g

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network card comparisons

All network card comparisons