Product comparison · 2 network cards

ASUS WL-BTD202 Blutooth Dongle, White vs Lenovo NetXtreme 1000 SX Fibre Ethernet Adapter

9specifications compared
9differ
0identical
13known for one product only

Key differences

Connectivity technology
- WL-BTD202 Blutooth Dongle, White:Wireless
- NetXtreme 1000 SX Fibre Ethernet Adapter:Wired
Host interface
- WL-BTD202 Blutooth Dongle, White:USB
- NetXtreme 1000 SX Fibre Ethernet Adapter:PCI
Maximum data transfer rate
- WL-BTD202 Blutooth Dongle, White:3 Mbit/s
- NetXtreme 1000 SX Fibre Ethernet Adapter:1000 Mbit/s
Operating temperature (T-T)
- WL-BTD202 Blutooth Dongle, White:0 - 55 °C
- NetXtreme 1000 SX Fibre Ethernet Adapter:0 - 50 °C
Width
- WL-BTD202 Blutooth Dongle, White:58.5 mm
- NetXtreme 1000 SX Fibre Ethernet Adapter:64 mm
Depth
- WL-BTD202 Blutooth Dongle, White:17 mm
- NetXtreme 1000 SX Fibre Ethernet Adapter:14 mm
Height
- WL-BTD202 Blutooth Dongle, White:8 mm
- NetXtreme 1000 SX Fibre Ethernet Adapter:167 mm
Weight
- WL-BTD202 Blutooth Dongle, White:6.8 g
- NetXtreme 1000 SX Fibre Ethernet Adapter:760 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of WL-BTD202 Blutooth Dongle, White, NetXtreme 1000 SX Fibre Ethernet Adapter
22 specifications	A ASUS WL-BTD202 Blutooth Dongle, White View product	B Lenovo NetXtreme 1000 SX Fibre Ethernet Adapter View product
Ports & interfaces2 differ
Connectivity technologyDiffers	Wireless	Wired
Host interfaceDiffers	USB	PCI
Network1 differ
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers	3 Mbit/s	1000 Mbit/s
Wi-Fi bandKnown for one	Single-band (2.4 GHz)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Frequency rangeKnown for one	2.4 - 2.4835 GHz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum operating distanceKnown for one	40 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
InternalKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Component forKnown for one	PC/Laptop	Unknown — not stated by the source
Antenna designKnown for one	Internal	Unknown — not stated by the source
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Power	Unknown — not stated by the source
System requirements1 differ
Compatible operating systemsDiffers	Windows 98SE/ME/2000/XP	- Microsoft Windows .NET - Microsoft Windows 2000 - Microsoft Windows NT 4.0 - Novell NetWare - SCO Unixware - Linux
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs	0 - 55 °C	0 - 50 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 - 95%
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	58.5 mm	64 mm
DepthDiffers	17 mm	14 mm
HeightDiffers	8 mm	167 mm
WeightDiffers	6.8 g	760 g
Other featuresidentical
Compliance industry standardsKnown for one	Bluetooth V2.0 + EDR, USB 1.1, USB 2.0	Unknown — not stated by the source
Networking featuresKnown for one	GAP, SDAP, SPP, DUN, FTP, LAP, SYNC, OPP, GEOP, HSP, HCRP, HID, BIP, A2DP	Unknown — not stated by the source
Security featuresKnown for one	Pairing, Encryption, Authentication	Unknown — not stated by the source
Output power descriptionKnown for one	+13dBm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	64 x 14 x 167 mm

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network card comparisons

All network card comparisons