Product comparison · 2 network cards

ASUS WL-130N network card 300 Mbit/s vs Zyxel AG-120 54 Mb Dual Band Wireless Cardbus Adapter 802.11 a/g

Add a product
  • 5specifications compared
  • 4differ
  • 1identical
  • 15known for one product only

Key differences

The ASUS WL-130N network card 300 Mbit/s has 246 Mbit/s more maximum data transfer rate than the Zyxel AG-120 54 Mb Dual Band Wireless Cardbus Adapter 802.11 a/g (300 Mbit/s vs 54 Mbit/s). Host interface: PCI on the ASUS WL-130N network card 300 Mbit/s, CardBus on the Zyxel AG-120 54 Mb Dual Band Wireless Cardbus Adapter 802.11 a/g. Dimensions (WxDxH): 40 x 122 x 4.6 mm on the ASUS WL-130N network card 300 Mbit/s, 53 x 115 x 6 mm on the Zyxel AG-120 54 Mb Dual Band Wireless Cardbus Adapter 802.11 a/g.

  • Host interface
    • WL-130N network card 300 Mbit/s:PCI
    • AG-120 54 Mb Dual Band Wireless Cardbus Adapter 802.11 a/g:CardBus
  • Maximum data transfer rate
    • WL-130N network card 300 Mbit/s:300 Mbit/s
    • AG-120 54 Mb Dual Band Wireless Cardbus Adapter 802.11 a/g:54 Mbit/s
  • Dimensions (WxDxH)
    • WL-130N network card 300 Mbit/s:40 x 122 x 4.6 mm
    • AG-120 54 Mb Dual Band Wireless Cardbus Adapter 802.11 a/g:53 x 115 x 6 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of WL-130N, AG-120 54 Mb Dual Band Wireless Cardbus Adapter 802.11 a/g
20 specifications
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Host interfaceDiffersPCICardBus
Network1 differ
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers300 Mbit/s54 Mbit/s
ModulationKnown for oneDSSS, OFDMUnknown — not stated by the source
Security algorithmsKnown for oneTKIP, WPA, WPA-PSK, WPA2, WPA2-PSKUnknown — not stated by the source
BandwidthKnown for one2.4 GHzUnknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Receiver sensitivityKnown for one-51 ~ -52dBm @ 300Mbps -74 ~ -75dBm @ 54Mbps -87 ~ -88dBm @ 11Mbps -95 ~ -97dBm @ 1MbpsUnknown — not stated by the source
CertificationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCE, FCC, RoHS
Poweridentical
TX power consumptionKnown for one850 mAUnknown — not stated by the source
RX power consumptionKnown for one600 mAUnknown — not stated by the source
System requirementsidentical
Compatible operating systemsKnown for oneWindows 2000/XP/VistaUnknown — not stated by the source
Other features2 differ
Channels quantityKnown for one13 channelsUnknown — not stated by the source
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs40 x 122 x 4.6 mm53 x 115 x 6 mm
Supported data transfer ratesDiffers1, 2, 5.5, 11, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 54, 300 Mbps54/48/36/24/18/12/11/9/6/5.5/2/1 Mbps
Slot typeKnown for onePCI 2.3Unknown — not stated by the source
Output power descriptionKnown for one12-14dBm @ g, 14-16dBm @ b, 14-16dBm @ nUnknown — not stated by the source
Compliance industry standardsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceIEEE 802.11b, IEEE 802.11a, IEEE 802.11g, Wi-Fi
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0 - 50 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source20 - 95%
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source40 g

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network card comparisons

All network card comparisons