Product comparison · 2 network cards

ASUS ROG USB-BE92 vs Conceptronic ABBY26B WiFi6 AX900 Dual Band Wireless USB Bluetooth Adapter

Add a product
  • 20specifications compared
  • 13differ
  • 7identical
  • 30known for one product only

Key differences

The ASUS ROG USB-BE92 has 5,600 Mbit/s more maximum data transfer rate than the Conceptronic ABBY26B WiFi6 AX900 Dual Band Wireless USB Bluetooth Adapter (6500 Mbit/s vs 900 Mbit/s). The ASUS ROG USB-BE92 has 96 mm more width than the Conceptronic ABBY26B WiFi6 AX900 Dual Band Wireless USB Bluetooth Adapter (112 mm vs 16 mm). The ASUS ROG USB-BE92 has 9.4 mm more depth than the Conceptronic ABBY26B WiFi6 AX900 Dual Band Wireless USB Bluetooth Adapter (16.8 mm vs 7.4 mm). Interface: WLAN on the ASUS ROG USB-BE92, WLAN / Bluetooth on the Conceptronic ABBY26B WiFi6 AX900 Dual Band Wireless USB Bluetooth Adapter. USB version: 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) on the ASUS ROG USB-BE92, 2.0 on the Conceptronic ABBY26B WiFi6 AX900 Dual Band Wireless USB Bluetooth Adapter.

  • Interface
    • ROG USB-BE92:WLAN
    • ABBY26B WiFi6 AX900 Dual Band Wireless USB Bluetooth Adapter:WLAN / Bluetooth
  • USB version
    • ROG USB-BE92:3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
    • ABBY26B WiFi6 AX900 Dual Band Wireless USB Bluetooth Adapter:2.0
  • Maximum data transfer rate
    • ROG USB-BE92:6500 Mbit/s
    • ABBY26B WiFi6 AX900 Dual Band Wireless USB Bluetooth Adapter:900 Mbit/s
  • Top Wi-Fi standard
    • ROG USB-BE92:Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be)
    • ABBY26B WiFi6 AX900 Dual Band Wireless USB Bluetooth Adapter:Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)
  • Security algorithms
    • ROG USB-BE92:WPA3
    • ABBY26B WiFi6 AX900 Dual Band Wireless USB Bluetooth Adapter:WEP, WPA, WPA2-PSK
  • Component for
    • ROG USB-BE92:PC
    • ABBY26B WiFi6 AX900 Dual Band Wireless USB Bluetooth Adapter:PC/Laptop
  • Width
    • ROG USB-BE92:112 mm
    • ABBY26B WiFi6 AX900 Dual Band Wireless USB Bluetooth Adapter:16 mm
  • Depth
    • ROG USB-BE92:16.8 mm
    • ABBY26B WiFi6 AX900 Dual Band Wireless USB Bluetooth Adapter:7.4 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of ROG USB-BE92, ABBY26B
50 specifications
Ports & interfaces2 differ
Connectivity technologyWirelessWireless
Host interfaceUSBUSB
InterfaceDiffersWLANWLAN / Bluetooth
USB connector form factorStraightStraight
USB versionDiffers3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)2.0
Network5 differ
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers6500 Mbit/s900 Mbit/s
Wi-FiYesYes
Wi-Fi bandDiffersTri-band (2.4 GHz / 5 GHz / 6 GHz)Dual-band (2.4 GHz / 5 GHz)
Top Wi-Fi standardDiffersWi-Fi 7 (802.11be)Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)
Wi-Fi standardsDiffers802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be)Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), 802.11a, 802.11b, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), 802.11g
Security algorithmsDiffersWPA3WEP, WPA, WPA2-PSK
BluetoothKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Bluetooth versionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5.3
Networking standardsKnown for oneIEEE 802.11a, IEEE 802.11ac, IEEE 802.11ax, IEEE 802.11b, IEEE 802.11be, IEEE 802.11g, IEEE 802.11nUnknown — not stated by the source
Frequency rangeKnown for one2.4 - 6 GHzUnknown — not stated by the source
ModulationKnown for one4096-QAM, OFDMAUnknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
InternalNoNo
Component forDiffersPCPC/Laptop
Product colourBlackBlack
Plug and PlayYesYes
Country of originKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceChina
AntennaKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Antenna designKnown for oneInternalUnknown — not stated by the source
System requirements1 differ
Windows operating systems supportedDiffersWindows 10 x64, Windows 11 x64Windows 10 Education, Windows 10 Education x64, Windows 10 Enterprise, Windows 10 Enterprise x64, Windows 10 Home, Windows 10 Home x64, Windows 10 IOT Core, Windows 10 IoT Enterprise, Windows 10 Pro, Windows 10 Pro x64, Windows 10 x64, Windows 11, Windows 11 Enterprise, Windows 11 Enterprise x64, Wi
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0 - 40 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source-40 - 70 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 - 95%
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers112 mm16 mm
DepthDiffers16.8 mm7.4 mm
HeightDiffers30 mm34 mm
WeightDiffers38 g3 g
Packaging dataidentical
Package typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBox
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source64 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source15 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source70 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source12 g
Packaging contentidentical
Quick installation guideKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Technical detailsidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCE, RoHS
Logistics dataidentical
Customs product code (TARIC)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source8517620000
Pallet gross widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source120 cm
Pallet gross lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source80 cm
Pallet gross heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source175.2 cm
Master (outer) cases per palletKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source60 pc(s)
Master (outer) case widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source350 mm
Master (outer) case lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source190 mm
Master (outer) case heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source320 mm
Master (outer) case gross weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.8 kg
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source200 pc(s)
Other featuresidentical
Housing materialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceABS
Poweridentical
USB poweredKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network card comparisons

All network card comparisons