Product comparison · 2 network cards

Allied Telesis High Speed 802.11g Wireless PCI Adapter vs Zyxel PLA-400 200 Mbit/s

11specifications compared
10differ
1identical
18known for one product only

Key differences

The Zyxel PLA-400 200 Mbit/s has 92 Mbit/s more maximum data transfer rate than the Allied Telesis High Speed 802.11g Wireless PCI Adapter (200 Mbit/s vs 108 Mbit/s). The Zyxel PLA-400 200 Mbit/s has 2 mm more width than the Allied Telesis High Speed 802.11g Wireless PCI Adapter (112 mm vs 110 mm). The Zyxel PLA-400 200 Mbit/s has 101 mm more depth than the Allied Telesis High Speed 802.11g Wireless PCI Adapter (106 mm vs 5 mm). Only the Allied Telesis High Speed 802.11g Wireless PCI Adapter has internal. Connectivity technology: Wireless on the Allied Telesis High Speed 802.11g Wireless PCI Adapter, Wired on the Zyxel PLA-400 200 Mbit/s.

Connectivity technology
- High Speed 802.11g Wireless PCI Adapter:Wireless
- PLA-400 200 Mbit/s:Wired
Host interface
- High Speed 802.11g Wireless PCI Adapter:CardBus
- PLA-400 200 Mbit/s:RJ-45
Maximum data transfer rate
- High Speed 802.11g Wireless PCI Adapter:108 Mbit/s
- PLA-400 200 Mbit/s:200 Mbit/s
Modulation
- High Speed 802.11g Wireless PCI Adapter:BPSK, OFDM, QPSK
- PLA-400 200 Mbit/s:DQPSK, OFDM
Internal
- High Speed 802.11g Wireless PCI Adapter:Yes
- PLA-400 200 Mbit/s:No
Operating temperature (T-T)
- High Speed 802.11g Wireless PCI Adapter:0 - 55 °C
- PLA-400 200 Mbit/s:0 - 45 °C
Width
- High Speed 802.11g Wireless PCI Adapter:110 mm
- PLA-400 200 Mbit/s:112 mm
Depth
- High Speed 802.11g Wireless PCI Adapter:5 mm
- PLA-400 200 Mbit/s:106 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of High Speed 802.11g Wireless PCI Adapter, PLA-400
29 specifications	A Allied Telesis High Speed 802.11g Wireless PCI Adapter View product	B Zyxel PLA-400 200 Mbit/s Model PLA-400 View product
Ports & interfaces2 differ
Connectivity technologyDiffers	Wireless	Wired
Host interfaceDiffers	CardBus	RJ-45
Network2 differ
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers	108 Mbit/s	200 Mbit/s
ModulationDiffers	BPSK, OFDM, QPSK	DQPSK, OFDM
Ethernet LANKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Frequency rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.002 - 0.03 GHz
Security algorithmsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	128-bit AES
Design2 differ
InternalDiffers	Yes	No
Plug and PlayKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Receiver sensitivityKnown for one	–84dBm, 11Mbps @ 8% PER, –90dBm, 2Mbps @ 8% PER	Unknown — not stated by the source
CertificationDiffers	FCC/EN55022 B, TUV, CE, Ghost, Wi-Fi	FCC, CE, UL, LVD
System requirementsidentical
Compatible operating systemsKnown for one	Windows 2000, Windows XP, Windows 2003	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs	0 - 55 °C	0 - 45 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	-20 - 70 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers	110 mm	112 mm
DepthDiffers	5 mm	106 mm
HeightDiffers	54 mm	28.5 mm
WeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	185.8 g
Other featuresidentical
GainKnown for one	5 dBi	Unknown — not stated by the source
Compliance industry standardsKnown for one	IEEE 802.11b, IEEE 802.11g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Channel bandwidthKnown for one	2400 MHz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Channels quantityKnown for one	13 channels	Unknown — not stated by the source
Supported data transfer ratesKnown for one	1, 2, 5.5, 6, 9, 11, 12, 24, 36, 48, 54, 108 Mbps	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power requirementsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100-240 VAC, 50 ~ 60 Hz, 0.08 A
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	112 x 106 x 28.5 mm
Link/Act LEDKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
I/O portsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 x HomePlug AV

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network card comparisons

All network card comparisons