Product comparison · 2 network cards

Allied Telesis AT-2750FX/ST 100 Mbit/s vs Allied Telesis AT-2972SX 1000 Mbit/s

Add a product
  • 15specifications compared
  • 10differ
  • 5identical
  • 6known for one product only

Key differences

The Allied Telesis AT-2972SX 1000 Mbit/s has 900 Mbit/s more maximum data transfer rate than the Allied Telesis AT-2750FX/ST 100 Mbit/s (1000 Mbit/s vs 100 Mbit/s). The Allied Telesis AT-2972SX 1000 Mbit/s has 4.4 W more power consumption (typical) than the Allied Telesis AT-2750FX/ST 100 Mbit/s (9.2 W vs 4.8 W). The Allied Telesis AT-2750FX/ST 100 Mbit/s has 73 mm more width than the Allied Telesis AT-2972SX 1000 Mbit/s (168 mm vs 95 mm). Host interface: PCI on the Allied Telesis AT-2750FX/ST 100 Mbit/s, PCI Express on the Allied Telesis AT-2972SX 1000 Mbit/s. Power requirements: 3.3/5V on the Allied Telesis AT-2750FX/ST 100 Mbit/s, 3.3V on the Allied Telesis AT-2972SX 1000 Mbit/s.

  • Host interface
    • AT-2750FX/ST 100 Mbit/s:PCI
    • AT-2972SX 1000 Mbit/s:PCI Express
  • Maximum data transfer rate
    • AT-2750FX/ST 100 Mbit/s:100 Mbit/s
    • AT-2972SX 1000 Mbit/s:1000 Mbit/s
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • AT-2750FX/ST 100 Mbit/s:4.8 W
    • AT-2972SX 1000 Mbit/s:9.2 W
  • Width
    • AT-2750FX/ST 100 Mbit/s:168 mm
    • AT-2972SX 1000 Mbit/s:95 mm
  • Weight
    • AT-2750FX/ST 100 Mbit/s:150 g
    • AT-2972SX 1000 Mbit/s:700 g
  • Power requirements
    • AT-2750FX/ST 100 Mbit/s:3.3/5V
    • AT-2972SX 1000 Mbit/s:3.3V
  • Connector(s)
    • AT-2750FX/ST 100 Mbit/s:ST
    • AT-2972SX 1000 Mbit/s:LC

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of AT-2750FX/ST, AT-2972SX
21 specifications
A

Allied Telesis

AT-2750FX/ST 100 Mbit/s

Model AT-2750FX/ST

View product
B

Allied Telesis

AT-2972SX 1000 Mbit/s

Model AT-2972SX

View product
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Host interfaceDiffersPCIPCI Express
Network1 differ
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers100 Mbit/s1000 Mbit/s
Security algorithmsKnown for one3DES, DESUnknown — not stated by the source
Full duplexKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Jumbo frames supportKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Design1 differ
CertificationDiffersUL FCC/EN55022 Class B TUV EN55024 CEMicrosoft RoHS UL, FCC/EN55022 Class B, TUV, EN55024, CE, C-TICK, VCCI
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs4.8 W9.2 W
System requirements1 differ
Compatible operating systemsDiffersWindows XPVista Vista 64-bit Windows XP Windows XP 64-bit Windows 2003 Windows 2003 64-bit Windows 2000 NDIS2 NetWare 6.x Linux 2.4 Linux 2.6 Windows NT 4 Solaris x86 Solaris Sparc 32-bit Solaris Sparc 64-bit NetWare 5.x
Weight & dimensions2 differ
WidthDiffers168 mm95 mm
HeightKnown for one69 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
WeightDiffers150 g700 g
DepthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source68 mm
Other features3 differ
Compliance industry standardsDiffersIEEE 802.2, IEEE 802.3ac, IEEE 802.3uIEEE 802.1p, IEEE 802.1Q, IEEE 802.2, IEEE 802.3ac, IEEE 802.3az, IEEE 802.3x, IEEE 802.3z, IEEE 802.3ad
Power requirementsDiffers3.3/5V3.3V
Connector(s)DiffersSTLC
Management protocolsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceWMI, ACPI 1.1, PXE 2.1 Boot ROM, SNMP

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network card comparisons

All network card comparisons