Product comparison · 2 network cards

Allied Telesis AT-2451FTX/ST Internal 100 Mbit/s vs Allied Telesis AT-2972SX 1000 Mbit/s

Add a product
  • 10specifications compared
  • 7differ
  • 3identical
  • 16known for one product only

Key differences

The Allied Telesis AT-2972SX 1000 Mbit/s has 900 Mbit/s more maximum data transfer rate than the Allied Telesis AT-2451FTX/ST Internal 100 Mbit/s (1000 Mbit/s vs 100 Mbit/s). The Allied Telesis AT-2451FTX/ST Internal 100 Mbit/s has 112 mm more depth than the Allied Telesis AT-2972SX 1000 Mbit/s (180 mm vs 68 mm). Host interface: PCI on the Allied Telesis AT-2451FTX/ST Internal 100 Mbit/s, PCI Express on the Allied Telesis AT-2972SX 1000 Mbit/s. Connector(s): RJ-45, ST on the Allied Telesis AT-2451FTX/ST Internal 100 Mbit/s, LC on the Allied Telesis AT-2972SX 1000 Mbit/s.

  • Host interface
    • AT-2451FTX/ST Internal 100 Mbit/s:PCI
    • AT-2972SX 1000 Mbit/s:PCI Express
  • Maximum data transfer rate
    • AT-2451FTX/ST Internal 100 Mbit/s:100 Mbit/s
    • AT-2972SX 1000 Mbit/s:1000 Mbit/s
  • Depth
    • AT-2451FTX/ST Internal 100 Mbit/s:180 mm
    • AT-2972SX 1000 Mbit/s:68 mm
  • Connector(s)
    • AT-2451FTX/ST Internal 100 Mbit/s:RJ-45, ST
    • AT-2972SX 1000 Mbit/s:LC

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of AT-2451FTX/ST, AT-2972SX
26 specifications
A

Allied Telesis

AT-2451FTX/ST Internal 100 Mbit/s

Model AT-2451FTX/ST

View product
B

Allied Telesis

AT-2972SX 1000 Mbit/s

Model AT-2972SX

View product
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Host interfaceDiffersPCIPCI Express
Network1 differ
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers100 Mbit/s1000 Mbit/s
Wake-on-LAN readyKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Full duplexKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Data link protocolsKnown for onePXE, NetWare NCP/IPX, IBM’s RPL, DHCP, BOOTPUnknown — not stated by the source
Jumbo frames supportKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Design1 differ
InternalKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Plug and PlayKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
CertificationDiffersFCC/EN55022 Class B, UL, TUV, EN55024, CEMicrosoft RoHS UL, FCC/EN55022 Class B, TUV, EN55024, CE, C-TICK, VCCI
System requirements1 differ
Compatible operating systemsDiffersNetware 4.2, 5, 6 Windows 95/98/ME/XP/NT4/2000/2003 Linux 2.2, 2.4Vista Vista 64-bit Windows XP Windows XP 64-bit Windows 2003 Windows 2003 64-bit Windows 2000 NDIS2 NetWare 6.x Linux 2.4 Linux 2.6 Windows NT 4 Solaris x86 Solaris Sparc 32-bit Solaris Sparc 64-bit NetWare 5.x
Operational conditionsidentical
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one5 - 95%Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source-25 - 70 °C
Weight & dimensions1 differ
DepthDiffers180 mm68 mm
HeightKnown for one65 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
WidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source95 mm
WeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source700 g
Other features2 differ
Compliance industry standardsDiffersIEEE 802.3u, IEEE 802.3jIEEE 802.1p, IEEE 802.1Q, IEEE 802.2, IEEE 802.3ac, IEEE 802.3az, IEEE 802.3x, IEEE 802.3z, IEEE 802.3ad
Connector(s)DiffersRJ-45, STLC
Networking featuresKnown for oneEthernet, Fast EthernetUnknown — not stated by the source
Power requirementsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3.3V
Link/Act LEDKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Management protocolsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceWMI, ACPI 1.1, PXE 2.1 Boot ROM, SNMP
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source9.2 W

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network card comparisons

All network card comparisons