Product comparison · 2 network cards

Allied Telesis 100TX 32-bit, PCI 2.2 compliant secure copper interface card vs ASUS WL-167G V2

8specifications compared
8differ
0identical
25known for one product only

Key differences

Connectivity technology
- 100TX 32-bit, PCI 2.2 compliant secure copper interface card:Wired
- WL-167G V2:Wireless
Host interface
- 100TX 32-bit, PCI 2.2 compliant secure copper interface card:PCI
- WL-167G V2:USB
Maximum data transfer rate
- 100TX 32-bit, PCI 2.2 compliant secure copper interface card:100 Mbit/s
- WL-167G V2:54 Mbit/s
Operating temperature (T-T)
- 100TX 32-bit, PCI 2.2 compliant secure copper interface card:0 - 50 °C
- WL-167G V2:-10 - 55 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)
- 100TX 32-bit, PCI 2.2 compliant secure copper interface card:-25 - 70 °C
- WL-167G V2:-40 - 70 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)
- 100TX 32-bit, PCI 2.2 compliant secure copper interface card:5 - 90%
- WL-167G V2:5 - 95%
Weight
- 100TX 32-bit, PCI 2.2 compliant secure copper interface card:150 g
- WL-167G V2:40 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 100TX 32-bit, PCI 2.2 compliant secure copper interface card, WL-167G V2
33 specifications	A Allied Telesis 100TX 32-bit, PCI 2.2 compliant secure copper interface card View product	B ASUS WL-167G V2 View product
Ports & interfaces2 differ
Connectivity technologyDiffers	Wired	Wireless
Host interfaceDiffers	PCI	USB
Network1 differ
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers	100 Mbit/s	54 Mbit/s
ModulationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	OFDM
Maximum operating distanceKnown for one	100 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Component forKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	PC/Laptop
Antenna typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Inverted-F
Electromagnetic compatibilityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	ETS 300 328, ETS 300 826; CE Mark; FCC P.15C, Sec. 15.247
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Known for one	300000 h	Unknown — not stated by the source
CertificationKnown for one	UL FCC/EN55022 Class B TUV EN55024 CE	Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
USB poweredKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	4 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
System requirements1 differ
Compatible operating systemsDiffers	Windows XP	Windows 98SE, ME, 2000, XP Linux Redhat (7.1)
Operational conditions3 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs	0 - 50 °C	-10 - 55 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Differs	-25 - 70 °C	-40 - 70 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs	5 - 90%	5 - 95%
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers	150 g	40 g
WidthKnown for one	168 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one	69 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
GainKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.77 dBi
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	25 x 75 x 9 mm
Link/Act LEDKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Networking featuresKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	WiFi
Supported data transfer ratesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 54, 1, 2, 5.5, 11
Wireless technologyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	802.11g, 802.11b
Outdoor rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	330 m
Indoor rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	40 m
Bundled softwareKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Mobile control center, Wireless setting, Mobile manager, Site survey
Output power descriptionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	14 - 17 dBm
Compliance industry standardsKnown for one	IEEE 802.2, IEEE 802.3ac, IEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3u	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power requirementsKnown for one	3.3/5V	Unknown — not stated by the source
Connector(s)Known for one	RJ-45	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network card comparisons

All network card comparisons