Product comparison · 2 network antennas

SilverNet SAN2416-90 network antenna N-type vs Zyxel ANT2105 Dual Pack

Add a product
  • 7specifications compared
  • 5differ
  • 2identical
  • 30known for one product only

Key differences

The SilverNet SAN2416-90 network antenna N-type has 143 mm more width than the Zyxel ANT2105 Dual Pack (165 mm vs 22 mm). The SilverNet SAN2416-90 network antenna N-type has 13 mm more depth than the Zyxel ANT2105 Dual Pack (35 mm vs 22 mm). The SilverNet SAN2416-90 network antenna N-type has 267 mm more height than the Zyxel ANT2105 Dual Pack (450 mm vs 183 mm). Frequency band: 2.3 - 2.7 GHz on the SilverNet SAN2416-90 network antenna N-type, 2.4/5 GHz on the Zyxel ANT2105 Dual Pack. Weight: 2 kg on the SilverNet SAN2416-90 network antenna N-type, 70 g on the Zyxel ANT2105 Dual Pack.

  • Frequency band
    • SAN2416-90 network antenna N-type:2.3 - 2.7 GHz
    • ANT2105 Dual Pack:2.4/5 GHz
  • Width
    • SAN2416-90 network antenna N-type:165 mm
    • ANT2105 Dual Pack:22 mm
  • Depth
    • SAN2416-90 network antenna N-type:35 mm
    • ANT2105 Dual Pack:22 mm
  • Height
    • SAN2416-90 network antenna N-type:450 mm
    • ANT2105 Dual Pack:183 mm
  • Weight
    • SAN2416-90 network antenna N-type:2 kg
    • ANT2105 Dual Pack:70 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of SAN2416-90, ANT2105 Dual Pack
37 specifications
Performance1 differ
Frequency bandDiffers2.3 - 2.7 GHz2.4/5 GHz
GainKnown for one16 dBiUnknown — not stated by the source
Horizontal beam widthKnown for one90°Unknown — not stated by the source
Vertical beam widthKnown for one15°Unknown — not stated by the source
Antenna gain level (max)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source7 dBi
Antenna gain (2.4 GHz)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4.5 dBi
Antenna gain (5 GHz)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source7 dBi
Featuresidentical
Connector genderKnown for oneFemaleUnknown — not stated by the source
PolarizationKnown for oneDual polarizationUnknown — not stated by the source
Voltage Standing Wave Ratio (VSWR)Known for one1.5Unknown — not stated by the source
Housing materialKnown for oneAcrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), MetalUnknown — not stated by the source
Wind loadKnown for one150Unknown — not stated by the source
Front to back ratioKnown for one25 dBUnknown — not stated by the source
MountingKnown for oneWall/PoleUnknown — not stated by the source
PurposeKnown for oneOutdoorUnknown — not stated by the source
Antenna typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceOmni-directional antenna
Certificatesidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneRoHSUnknown — not stated by the source
CertificationKnown for oneCE, RoHSUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers165 mm22 mm
DepthDiffers35 mm22 mm
HeightDiffers450 mm183 mm
WeightDiffers2 kg70 g
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one160 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one760 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one68 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one3.24 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Package typeKnown for oneBoxUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Quantity per packKnown for one1 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Bolts includedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Mounting brackets includedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Mounting kitKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Country of originKnown for oneUnited KingdomUnknown — not stated by the source
UK Trade Tariff codeKnown for one85177100Unknown — not stated by the source
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source85177100
Other featuresidentical
Connector(s)Known for one2x N-typeUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network antenna comparisons

All network antenna comparisons