Product comparison · 2 network antennas

CoreParts LTE Antenna SMA Male 829MHz~5.5GHz vs Zyxel ANT1315 network antenna Directional antenna N-type 15 dBi

5specifications compared
5differ
0identical
21known for one product only

Key differences

The Zyxel ANT1315 network antenna Directional antenna N-type 15 dBi has 139 mm more width than the CoreParts LTE Antenna SMA Male 829MHz~5.5GHz (320 mm vs 181 mm). The Zyxel ANT1315 network antenna Directional antenna N-type 15 dBi has 19 mm more depth than the CoreParts LTE Antenna SMA Male 829MHz~5.5GHz (43 mm vs 24 mm). The Zyxel ANT1315 network antenna Directional antenna N-type 15 dBi has 300 mm more height than the CoreParts LTE Antenna SMA Male 829MHz~5.5GHz (320 mm vs 20 mm). Frequency band: 0.8-5.5 GHz on the CoreParts LTE Antenna SMA Male 829MHz~5.5GHz, 2.4 - 2.5 GHz on the Zyxel ANT1315 network antenna Directional antenna N-type 15 dBi. Weight: 10 g on the CoreParts LTE Antenna SMA Male 829MHz~5.5GHz, 1.14 kg on the Zyxel ANT1315 network antenna Directional antenna N-type 15 dBi.

Frequency band
- LTE Antenna SMA Male 829MHz~5.5GHz:0.8-5.5 GHz
- ANT1315 network antenna Directional antenna N-type 15 dBi:2.4 - 2.5 GHz
Width
- LTE Antenna SMA Male 829MHz~5.5GHz:181 mm
- ANT1315 network antenna Directional antenna N-type 15 dBi:320 mm
Depth
- LTE Antenna SMA Male 829MHz~5.5GHz:24 mm
- ANT1315 network antenna Directional antenna N-type 15 dBi:43 mm
Height
- LTE Antenna SMA Male 829MHz~5.5GHz:20 mm
- ANT1315 network antenna Directional antenna N-type 15 dBi:320 mm
Weight
- LTE Antenna SMA Male 829MHz~5.5GHz:10 g
- ANT1315 network antenna Directional antenna N-type 15 dBi:1.14 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of LTE Antenna SMA Male 829MHz~5.5GHz, ANT1315
26 specifications	A CoreParts LTE Antenna SMA Male 829MHz~5.5GHz View product	B Zyxel ANT1315 network antenna Directional antenna N-type 15 dBi Model ANT1315 View product
Performance1 differ
Antenna gain level (max)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	15 dBi
Frequency bandDiffers	0.8-5.5 GHz	2.4 - 2.5 GHz
ImpedanceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	50 Ω
Featuresidentical
Antenna typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Directional antenna
Antenna connector typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	N-type
Product colourKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Grey
Ultraviolet (UV) resistantKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Survival wind speedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	216 km/h
Connector genderKnown for one	Male	Unknown — not stated by the source
International Protection (IP) codeKnown for one	IP55	Unknown — not stated by the source
MountingKnown for one	Pole	Unknown — not stated by the source
Compatible productsKnown for one	LTE Antenna	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-40 - 80 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0 - 95%
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	181 mm	320 mm
DepthDiffers	24 mm	43 mm
HeightDiffers	20 mm	320 mm
WeightDiffers	10 g	1.14 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Mounting kitKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Quick installation guideKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	181 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one	24 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one	20 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one	10 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Frequency rangeKnown for one	698MHz ~ 960MHz, 700MHz ~ 960MHz, 1.176GHz ~ 1.28GHz, 1.4GHz ~ 1.61GHz, 1.71GHz ~ 2.17GHz, 1.71GHz ~ 2.69GHz, 2.17GHz ~ 2.69GHz, 3.3GHz ~ 4GHz, 4GHz ~ 5GHz, 5GHz ~ 6GHz	Unknown — not stated by the source
RF-connectorKnown for one	Cellular	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network antenna comparisons

All network antenna comparisons