Product comparison · 2 navigators

MEDION GoPal PNA460 vs Nilox NX-ITALY NAVIGATOR 100 - AUTOVELOX

Add a product
  • 22specifications compared
  • 10differ
  • 12identical
  • 16known for one product only

Key differences

The MEDION GoPal PNA460 has 1 h more battery life (max) than the Nilox NX-ITALY NAVIGATOR 100 - AUTOVELOX (4 h vs 3 h). The MEDION GoPal PNA460 has 72 g more weight than the Nilox NX-ITALY NAVIGATOR 100 - AUTOVELOX (210 g vs 138 g). The MEDION GoPal PNA460 has 45 mm more width than the Nilox NX-ITALY NAVIGATOR 100 - AUTOVELOX (130 mm vs 85 mm). Only the MEDION GoPal PNA460 has outdoor (hiking, trekking). Display resolution: 480 x 272 pixels on the MEDION GoPal PNA460, 320 x 240 pixels on the Nilox NX-ITALY NAVIGATOR 100 - AUTOVELOX.

  • Outdoor (hiking, trekking)
    • GoPal PNA460:Yes
    • NX-ITALY NAVIGATOR 100 - AUTOVELOX:No
  • Display resolution
    • GoPal PNA460:480 x 272 pixels
    • NX-ITALY NAVIGATOR 100 - AUTOVELOX:320 x 240 pixels
  • Display size (HxV) (imperial)
    • GoPal PNA460:4.3
    • NX-ITALY NAVIGATOR 100 - AUTOVELOX:88.9 x 88.9 mm (3.5 x 3.5")
  • Battery life (max)
    • GoPal PNA460:4 h
    • NX-ITALY NAVIGATOR 100 - AUTOVELOX:3 h
  • Weight
    • GoPal PNA460:210 g
    • NX-ITALY NAVIGATOR 100 - AUTOVELOX:138 g
  • Width
    • GoPal PNA460:130 mm
    • NX-ITALY NAVIGATOR 100 - AUTOVELOX:85 mm
  • Height
    • GoPal PNA460:90 mm
    • NX-ITALY NAVIGATOR 100 - AUTOVELOX:98 mm
  • Antenna type
    • GoPal PNA460:Internal
    • NX-ITALY NAVIGATOR 100 - AUTOVELOX:GPS

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of GoPal PNA460, NX-ITALY NAVIGATOR 100 - AUTOVELOX
38 specifications
GPS type1 differ
Marine (chartplotters, sounders)NoNo
Sport (fitness, running)NoNo
Outdoor (hiking, trekking)DiffersYesNo
Geocaching (GPS stash hunt)NoNo
AutoYesYes
AviationNoNo
GPS Performanceidentical
Channels quantity20 channels20 channels
GPS accuracy - positionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10 m
Display2 differ
DisplayLCDLCD
Display number of coloursKnown for one65536 coloursUnknown — not stated by the source
Display resolutionDiffers480 x 272 pixels320 x 240 pixels
Display size (HxV) (imperial)Differs4.388.9 x 88.9 mm (3.5 x 3.5")
TouchscreenKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Networkidentical
BluetoothNoNo
Performanceidentical
Processor modelKnown for oneSamsung S3C2440Unknown — not stated by the source
Processor frequency400 MHz400 MHz
Operating system installedKnown for oneWindows CE 5.0Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Product colourBlackBlack
Interface typeKnown for oneTouch ScreenUnknown — not stated by the source
Form factorKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceFixed
Power1 differ
Battery life (max)Differs4 h3 h
System requirementsidentical
Minimum processorKnown for oneIntel Pentium 750MHzUnknown — not stated by the source
Batteryidentical
Battery technologyLithium-Ion (Li-Ion)Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion)
Battery capacityKnown for one1200 mAhUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WeightDiffers210 g138 g
WidthDiffers130 mm85 mm
Depth20 mm20 mm
HeightDiffers90 mm98 mm
Packaging content1 differ
Bundled softwareDiffersGoPal Navigator AE 2.0Navman navigation software, Tele Atlas
Other features2 differ
GPS receiverKnown for oneSiRFstar IIIUnknown — not stated by the source
Antenna typeDiffersInternalGPS
BasemapKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Compatible operating systemsDiffersMicrosoft Windows 2000/XPOS Smart ST 2008
InterfaceKnown for oneUSB 1.1Unknown — not stated by the source
Internal memoryKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source32 MB
Mapidentical
Map storageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceInternal storage
Map view optionsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2D/3D
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More navigator comparisons

All navigator comparisons