All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 nas & storage servers

QNAP TS-EC1679U-RP, 16x 2 TB vs QNAP TS-EC1679U-RP 64TB

Add a product
  • 113specifications compared
  • 13differ
  • 100identical
  • 17known for one product only

Key differences

The QNAP TS-EC1679U-RP 64TB has 32 TB more total installed storage capacity than the QNAP TS-EC1679U-RP, 16x 2 TB (64 TB vs 32 TB). The QNAP TS-EC1679U-RP 64TB has 2 TB more storage drive capacity than the QNAP TS-EC1679U-RP, 16x 2 TB (4 TB vs 2 TB). The QNAP TS-EC1679U-RP 64TB has 0.1 W more power consumption (sleep) than the QNAP TS-EC1679U-RP, 16x 2 TB (89.1 W vs 89 W). Compliance industry standards: IEEE 802.3, 802.3u, 802.3ab on the QNAP TS-EC1679U-RP, 16x 2 TB, IEEE 802.3ad on the QNAP TS-EC1679U-RP 64TB. LED indicators: HDD, LAN, Status on the QNAP TS-EC1679U-RP, 16x 2 TB, eSATA, HDD, LAN, Status on the QNAP TS-EC1679U-RP 64TB.

  • Total installed storage capacity
    • 32 TB
    • 64 TB
  • Storage drive capacity
    • 2 TB
    • 4 TB
  • Compliance industry standards
    • IEEE 802.3, 802.3u, 802.3ab
    • IEEE 802.3ad
  • LED indicators
    • HDD, LAN, Status
    • eSATA, HDD, LAN, Status
  • Operating system installed
    • Linux
    • QNAP Turbo NAS System
  • Power consumption (sleep)
    • 89 W
    • 89.1 W
  • Weight
    • 18.1 kg
    • 18.4 kg
  • Fan
    • 6 cm, 12V DC
    • 60mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
130 specifications
A

QNAP

TS-EC1679U-RP, 16x 2 TBView product
B

QNAP

TS-EC1679U-RP 64TBView product
Storage3 differ
Total installed storage capacityDiffers32 TB64 TB
Storage drive capacityDiffers2 TB4 TB
Storage drive interfaceDiffersSerial ATA, Serial ATA II, Serial ATA IIISerial ATA II, Serial ATA III
Processoridentical
L3 cacheKnown for one6 MB
Network2 differ
Ethernet LANKnown for oneYes
Ethernet LAN data ratesKnown for one10,100,1000 Mbit/s
Wi-FiKnown for oneNo
Wake-on-LAN readyKnown for oneYes
Compliance industry standardsDiffersIEEE 802.3, 802.3u, 802.3abIEEE 802.3ad
Supported network protocolsDiffersTCP/IP (IPv4, IPv6), CIFS/SMB, AFP (v3.3), NFS(v3), FTP, FTPS, SFTP, TFTP, HTTP(S), Telnet, SSH, iSCSI, SNMP, SMTP, SMSC, UPnPCIFS/SMB, AFP (v3.3), NFS(v3), FTP, FTPS, SFTP, TFTP, HTTP(S), Telnet, SSH, iSCSI, SNMP, SMTP, SMSC
Maximum data transfer rateKnown for one1000 Mbit/s
Ports & interfacesidentical
WAN connectionKnown for oneEthernet (RJ-45)
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantityKnown for one1
HDMI ports quantityKnown for one1
Design1 differ
LED indicatorsDiffersHDD, LAN, StatuseSATA, HDD, LAN, Status
Performance1 differ
Access Control List (ACL)Known for oneYes
Security algorithmsDiffers256-bit AES, 802.1x RADIUS, HTTPS, SSH, SSL/TLS256-bit AES, FIPS 140-2, SSH, SSL/TLS
Noise levelKnown for one55.13 dB
Software1 differ
Operating system installedDiffersLinuxQNAP Turbo NAS System
Operating system versionKnown for one3.7
Power1 differ
Number of power supply unitsKnown for one2
Power consumption (sleep)Differs89 W89.1 W
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers18.1 kg18.4 kg
Operational conditionsidentical
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one0 - 90%
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one0 - 90%
Other features3 differ
Compatible operating systemsDiffersWindows XP, Vista, Windows 7 (32/64-bit), Windows Server 2003/2008 R2, Apple Mac OS X, Linux & UNIXWindows XP, Vista, 7, Server 2003/2008 R2 Apple Mac OS X Linux & UNIX
Data transfer rateKnown for one6 Gbit/s
FanDiffers6 cm, 12V DC60mm
Power requirementsDiffers100-240V AC, 50/60Hz100-240V
Power LEDKnown for oneYes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More nas & storage servers comparisons

All nas & storage servers comparisons