Product comparison · 2 nas & storage servers

QNAP TS-201 NAS/storage server Desktop vs QNAP TS-209 NAS/storage server Desktop

Key differences

Processor frequency
- TS-201 NAS/storage server Desktop:0.266 GHz
- TS-209 NAS/storage server Desktop:0.5 GHz
Flash memory
- TS-201 NAS/storage server Desktop:16 MB
- TS-209 NAS/storage server Desktop:8 MB
LED indicators
- TS-201 NAS/storage server Desktop:HDD, LAN, Status, USB
- TS-209 NAS/storage server Desktop:LAN, Status, USB
Number of users
- TS-201 NAS/storage server Desktop:128 user(s)
- TS-209 NAS/storage server Desktop:256 user(s)
Power consumption (typical)
- TS-201 NAS/storage server Desktop:25.2 W
- TS-209 NAS/storage server Desktop:29.3 W
Power consumption (sleep)
- TS-201 NAS/storage server Desktop:10.2 W
- TS-209 NAS/storage server Desktop:14.8 W
Relative humidity
- TS-201 NAS/storage server Desktop:0 - 85%
- TS-209 NAS/storage server Desktop:0 - 95%

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of TS-201, TS-209
38 specifications	A QNAP TS-201 NAS/storage server Desktop Model TS-201 View product	B QNAP TS-209 NAS/storage server Desktop Model TS-209 View product
Storageidentical
RAID levelsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Processor1 differ
Processor frequencyDiffers	0.266 GHz	0.5 GHz
Memory1 differ
Internal memory typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	DDR2
Flash memoryDiffers	16 MB	8 MB
Design1 differ
LED indicatorsDiffers	HDD, LAN, Status, USB	LAN, Status, USB
Performance1 differ
Number of usersDiffers	128 user(s)	256 user(s)
Power2 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	25.2 W	29.3 W
Power consumption (sleep)Differs	10.2 W	14.8 W
Operational conditions1 differ
Relative humidityDiffers	0 - 85%	0 - 95%
Other features1 differ
Compatible operating systemsDiffers	Windows 98/ME/NT/ 2000/XP/2003/Vista Mac OSX	Windows 98/ ME/ NT/ 2000/ XP/ 2003/ Vista/ 7 Macintosh OSX

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.