Product comparison · 2 nas & storage servers

QNAP TS-1231XU NAS Annapurna Labs Alpine AL-314 vs QNAP TS-1231XU-RP NAS Annapurna Labs AL314

89specifications compared
10differ
79identical
4known for one product only

Key differences

Processor model
- TS-1231XU NAS Annapurna Labs Alpine AL-314:Alpine AL-314
- TS-1231XU-RP NAS Annapurna Labs AL314:AL314
Noise level
- TS-1231XU NAS Annapurna Labs Alpine AL-314:41.6 dB
- TS-1231XU-RP NAS Annapurna Labs AL314:47.6 dB
Power supply unit (PSU) capacity
- TS-1231XU NAS Annapurna Labs Alpine AL-314:240 W
- TS-1231XU-RP NAS Annapurna Labs AL314:250 W
Number of power supply units
- TS-1231XU NAS Annapurna Labs Alpine AL-314:1
- TS-1231XU-RP NAS Annapurna Labs AL314:2
Power consumption (typical)
- TS-1231XU NAS Annapurna Labs Alpine AL-314:77.32 W
- TS-1231XU-RP NAS Annapurna Labs AL314:88.27 W
Output current
- TS-1231XU NAS Annapurna Labs Alpine AL-314:3.5 A
- TS-1231XU-RP NAS Annapurna Labs AL314:5 A
Weight
- TS-1231XU NAS Annapurna Labs Alpine AL-314:11.3 kg
- TS-1231XU-RP NAS Annapurna Labs AL314:13 kg
Package weight
- TS-1231XU NAS Annapurna Labs Alpine AL-314:13.2 kg
- TS-1231XU-RP NAS Annapurna Labs AL314:14.9 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of TS-1231XU, TS-1231XU-RP
93 specifications	A QNAP TS-1231XU NAS Annapurna Labs Alpine AL-314 Model TS-1231XU View product	B QNAP TS-1231XU-RP NAS Annapurna Labs AL314 Model TS-1231XU-RP View product
Storageidentical
Storage drive sizes supportedKnown for one	2.5,3.5"	Unknown — not stated by the source
Hot-swap drive baysKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage drive sizeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2.5/3.5"
Processor1 differ
Processor modelDiffers	Alpine AL-314	AL314
Performance1 differ
Noise levelDiffers	41.6 dB	47.6 dB
Software2 differ
Mac operating systems supportedDiffers	Mac OS X 10.0 Cheetah, Mac OS X 10.10 Yosemite, Mac OS X 10.11 El Capitan, Mac OS X 10.12 Sierra, Mac OS X 10.7 Lion, Mac OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion, Mac OS X 10.9 Mavericks	Mac OS X 10.0 Cheetah, Mac OS X 10.1 Puma, Mac OS X 10.10 Yosemite, Mac OS X 10.11 El Capitan, Mac OS X 10.12 Sierra, Mac OS X 10.2 Jaguar, Mac OS X 10.3 Panther, Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger, Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard, Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard, Mac OS X 10.7 Lion, Mac OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion, Mac OS X 10.9 Ma
Server operating systems supportedDiffers	Windows Server 2003, Windows Server 2008 R2, Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2012 R2, Windows Server 2016	Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2012 R2
Power4 differ
Power supply unit (PSU) capacityDiffers	240 W	250 W
Number of power supply unitsDiffers	1	2
Power consumption (typical)Differs	77.32 W	88.27 W
Output currentDiffers	3.5 A	5 A
Redundant power supply (RPS) supportKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Weight & dimensions2 differ
WeightDiffers	11.3 kg	13 kg
Package weightDiffers	13.2 kg	14.9 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More nas & storage servers comparisons

All nas & storage servers comparisons