Product comparison · 2 nas & storage servers

QNAP TS-119P II, 1x 3 TB vs QNAP TS-459U-SP+, 2x 3 TB

Add a product
  • 49specifications compared
  • 25differ
  • 24identical
  • 11known for one product only

Key differences

The QNAP TS-459U-SP+, 2x 3 TB has 1 more storage drives installed than the QNAP TS-119P II, 1x 3 TB (2 vs 1). The QNAP TS-459U-SP+, 2x 3 TB has 3 more storage drives supported than the QNAP TS-119P II, 1x 3 TB (4 vs 1). The QNAP TS-119P II, 1x 3 TB has 0.2 GHz more processor frequency than the QNAP TS-459U-SP+, 2x 3 TB (2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). RAID levels: 1 on the QNAP TS-119P II, 1x 3 TB, 0, 1, 5, 6, 10, JBOD on the QNAP TS-459U-SP+, 2x 3 TB. Processor family: Marvell on the QNAP TS-119P II, 1x 3 TB, Intel Atom® on the QNAP TS-459U-SP+, 2x 3 TB.

  • Number of storage drives installed
    • TS-119P II, 1x 3 TB:1
    • TS-459U-SP+, 2x 3 TB:2
  • Number of storage drives supported
    • TS-119P II, 1x 3 TB:1
    • TS-459U-SP+, 2x 3 TB:4
  • RAID levels
    • TS-119P II, 1x 3 TB:1
    • TS-459U-SP+, 2x 3 TB:0, 1, 5, 6, 10, JBOD
  • Processor family
    • TS-119P II, 1x 3 TB:Marvell
    • TS-459U-SP+, 2x 3 TB:Intel Atom®
  • Processor frequency
    • TS-119P II, 1x 3 TB:2 GHz
    • TS-459U-SP+, 2x 3 TB:1.8 GHz
  • Internal memory
    • TS-119P II, 1x 3 TB:0.5 GB
    • TS-459U-SP+, 2x 3 TB:1 GB
  • Flash memory
    • TS-119P II, 1x 3 TB:16 MB
    • TS-459U-SP+, 2x 3 TB:512 MB
  • Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports
    • TS-119P II, 1x 3 TB:1
    • TS-459U-SP+, 2x 3 TB:2

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of TS-119P II, 1x 3 TB, TS-459U-SP+, 2x 3 TB
60 specifications
Storage3 differ
Number of storage drives installedDiffers12
Number of storage drives supportedDiffers14
RAID levelsDiffers10, 1, 5, 6, 10, JBOD
Processor2 differ
Processor familyDiffersMarvellIntel Atom®
Processor frequencyDiffers2 GHz1.8 GHz
Processor coresKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2
Memory2 differ
Internal memoryDiffers0.5 GB1 GB
Internal memory typeKnown for oneDDR3Unknown — not stated by the source
Flash memoryDiffers16 MB512 MB
Networkidentical
Maximum data transfer rateKnown for one1000 Mbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source
Jumbo frames supportKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Ports & interfaces3 differ
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsDiffers12
USB 2.0 ports quantityDiffers15
eSATA ports quantityDiffers12
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Design2 differ
Chassis typeDiffersTowerRack (1U)
Number of fansDiffers1 fan(s)3 fan(s)
Cable lock slotKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Performance2 differ
Number of usersDiffers2048 user(s)4096 user(s)
Noise levelKnown for one12.83 dBUnknown — not stated by the source
Security algorithmsDiffers128-bit AES, 256-bit AES, HTTPS, SSH, SSL/TLS256-bit AES, 802.1x RADIUS, HTTPS, SSH, SSL/TLS
Web-based managementKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Power3 differ
Power supply unit (PSU) capacityDiffers36 W150 W
Power consumption (typical)Differs7 W62 W
Power consumption (sleep)Differs4 W48 W
Weight & dimensions5 differ
WidthDiffers73 mm439 mm
DepthDiffers255 mm499 mm
HeightDiffers168.5 mm44 mm
WeightDiffers1.04 kg7.63 kg
Package weightDiffers1.8 kg9.55 kg
Packaging contentidentical
External power adapterKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Other features3 differ
Compatible operating systemsDiffersWindows 2000, XP, Vista (32/ 64 bit), Windows 7 (32/ 64 bit), Windows Server 2003/ 2008, Apple Mac OS X, Linux & UnixWindows 2000, XP, Vista (32/ 64 bit), Windows 7 (32/ 64 bit), Server 2003/ 2008, Apple Mac OS X, Linux & Unix
FanDiffers5 cm, 12V DC4 cm, 12V DC
Power LEDKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Power requirementsDiffers100-240V100-240V AC, 50/60Hz
Softwareidentical
Operating system installedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceLinux

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More nas & storage servers comparisons

All nas & storage servers comparisons