Product comparison · 2 nas & storage servers

QNAP TS-109 Pro Turbo NAS 2TB vs QNAP TS-439U-RP Turbo NAS

Add a product
  • 15specifications compared
  • 13differ
  • 2identical
  • 24known for one product only

Key differences

  • Total installed storage capacity
    • TS-109 Pro Turbo NAS 2TB:2 TB
    • TS-439U-RP Turbo NAS:0 TB
  • Number of storage drives installed
    • TS-109 Pro Turbo NAS 2TB:1
    • TS-439U-RP Turbo NAS:0
  • Storage drive capacity
    • TS-109 Pro Turbo NAS 2TB:2 TB
    • TS-439U-RP Turbo NAS:0 GB
  • Storage drive interface
    • TS-109 Pro Turbo NAS 2TB:Serial ATA II
    • TS-439U-RP Turbo NAS:Serial ATA
  • Storage drive size
    • TS-109 Pro Turbo NAS 2TB:3.5"
    • TS-439U-RP Turbo NAS:2.5"
  • Processor frequency
    • TS-109 Pro Turbo NAS 2TB:0.5 GHz
    • TS-439U-RP Turbo NAS:1.6 GHz
  • Internal memory
    • TS-109 Pro Turbo NAS 2TB:0.125 GB
    • TS-439U-RP Turbo NAS:1 GB
  • Flash memory
    • TS-109 Pro Turbo NAS 2TB:8 MB
    • TS-439U-RP Turbo NAS:128 MB

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of TS-109 Pro Turbo NAS 2TB, TS-439U-RP Turbo NAS
39 specifications
Storage5 differ
Total installed storage capacityDiffers2 TB0 TB
Number of storage drives installedDiffers10
Number of storage drives supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4
Storage drive capacityDiffers2 TB0 GB
Storage drive interfaceDiffersSerial ATA IISerial ATA
Storage drive sizeDiffers3.5"2.5"
Supported file systemsKnown for oneEXT3Unknown — not stated by the source
Processor1 differ
Processor familyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceIntel Atom®
Processor frequencyDiffers0.5 GHz1.6 GHz
Number of processors installedKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Memory2 differ
Internal memoryDiffers0.125 GB1 GB
Flash memoryDiffers8 MB128 MB
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsDiffers12
USB 2.0 ports quantity33
eSATAKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Number of fansKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4 fan(s)
LED indicatorsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Performanceidentical
BuzzerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
On/off switchKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Reset buttonKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Access Control List (ACL)Known for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Power consumption (sleep)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source23 W
Output powerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source150 W
Power consumption (typical)Known for one14.4 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers1.2 kg7.6 kg
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source12.1 kg
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs0 - 35 °C0 - 40 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)0 - 95%0 - 95%
Other features2 differ
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs210 x 60 x 182 mm439 x 499 x 44 mm
FanKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4 cm, 12V DC
Link/Act LEDKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Power requirementsDiffers100-240V AC, 50/60Hz100-240 VAC, 50-60Hz, 2A
Connectivity LEDsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Power consumption (active)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source53 W
Compatible operating systemsKnown for oneMicrosoft Windows 98/ ME/ NT/ 2000/ XP/ 2003/ Vista/ Windows 7 (32bit & 64bit), Mac OSX, Linux, UnixUnknown — not stated by the source
Networkidentical
DHCP clientKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
DHCP serverKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Jumbo frames supportKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Supported network protocolsKnown for oneTCP/IP, DHCP Client, DHCP Server, CIFS/SMB, AFP, NFS, HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, DDNS, NTP, Jumbo FrameUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More nas & storage servers comparisons

All nas & storage servers comparisons