Product comparison · 2 nas & storage servers

QNAP TS-100 NAS/storage server vs QNAP TS-109 Pro

Key differences

Processor frequency
- TS-100 NAS/storage server:0.2 GHz
- TS-109 Pro:0.5 GHz
Internal memory
- TS-100 NAS/storage server:0.03125 GB
- TS-109 Pro:0.125 GB
Flash memory
- TS-100 NAS/storage server:4 MB
- TS-109 Pro:8 MB
Number of users
- TS-100 NAS/storage server:128 user(s)
- TS-109 Pro:256 user(s)
Power consumption (typical)
- TS-100 NAS/storage server:14.4 W
- TS-109 Pro:6.6 W
Power consumption (sleep)
- TS-100 NAS/storage server:6.6 W
- TS-109 Pro:14.4 W
Relative humidity
- TS-100 NAS/storage server:0 - 85%
- TS-109 Pro:0 - 95%
Power requirements
- TS-100 NAS/storage server:100 - 240 V
- TS-109 Pro:100 - 240 V, 50/60 Hz

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of TS-100, TS-109 Pro
37 specifications	A QNAP TS-100 NAS/storage server Model TS-100 View product	B QNAP TS-109 Pro View product
Processor1 differ
Processor frequencyDiffers	0.2 GHz	0.5 GHz
Memory2 differ
Internal memoryDiffers	0.03125 GB	0.125 GB
Flash memoryDiffers	4 MB	8 MB
Internal memory typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	DDR2
Performance1 differ
Number of usersDiffers	128 user(s)	256 user(s)
Noise levelKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	33 dB
Power2 differ
Power supply unit (PSU) capacityKnown for one	36 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (typical)Differs	14.4 W	6.6 W
Power consumption (sleep)Differs	6.6 W	14.4 W
Packaging contentidentical
External power adapterKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditions1 differ
Relative humidityDiffers	0 - 85%	0 - 95%
Other features2 differ
Compatible operating systemsDiffers	Windows 98/ME/NT/ 2000/XP/2003/Vista Mac OSX	Microsoft 98/ ME/ NT/ 2000/ XP/ 2003/ Vista/ 7 Mac OSX Linux, Unix
Power requirementsDiffers	100 - 240 V	100 - 240 V, 50/60 Hz

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.