Product comparison · 2 nas & storage servers

NETGEAR RNDP400U Intel Atom® vs NETGEAR RNRX441E Rack (1U)

Add a product
  • 23specifications compared
  • 13differ
  • 10identical
  • 22known for one product only

Key differences

  • Total installed storage capacity
    • RNDP400U Intel Atom®:0 TB
    • RNRX441E Rack (1U):4 TB
  • Number of storage drives installed
    • RNDP400U Intel Atom®:0
    • RNRX441E Rack (1U):4
  • Storage drive capacity
    • RNDP400U Intel Atom®:0 GB
    • RNRX441E Rack (1U):1 TB
  • Storage drive interface
    • RNDP400U Intel Atom®:Serial ATA
    • RNRX441E Rack (1U):Serial ATA II
  • Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports
    • RNDP400U Intel Atom®:1
    • RNRX441E Rack (1U):2
  • Management protocols
    • RNDP400U Intel Atom®:HTTPS, FTPS
    • RNRX441E Rack (1U):SNMP
  • Power supply unit (PSU) capacity
    • RNDP400U Intel Atom®:120 W
    • RNRX441E Rack (1U):220 W
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • RNDP400U Intel Atom®:48 W
    • RNRX441E Rack (1U):80 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of RNDP400U, RNRX441E
45 specifications
B

NETGEAR

RNRX441E Rack (1U)

Model RNRX441E

View product
Storage4 differ
Total installed storage capacityDiffers0 TB4 TB
Number of storage drives installedDiffers04
Storage drive capacityDiffers0 GB1 TB
Storage drive interfaceDiffersSerial ATASerial ATA II
Storage drive sizeKnown for one3.5"Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum supported storage capacityKnown for one8 TBUnknown — not stated by the source
Supported file systemsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceExt2, Ext3, FAT32, NTFS
Processoridentical
Processor familyKnown for oneIntel Atom®Unknown — not stated by the source
Processor frequencyKnown for one1.6 GHzUnknown — not stated by the source
Memoryidentical
Internal memory typeKnown for oneDDR2Unknown — not stated by the source
Networkidentical
iSCSI supportKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Compliance industry standardsKnown for oneIEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3u, IEEE 802.3abUnknown — not stated by the source
Data link protocolsKnown for oneCIFs/SMB, AFP, NFS, HTTP/S, FTP/SUnknown — not stated by the source
DHCP serverKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Supported network protocolsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCIFS/SMB, AFP 3.1, NFS v2/v3, HTTP/S, FTP/S, WebDAV, UPnP
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsDiffers12
Performance1 differ
Management protocolsDiffersHTTPS, FTPSSNMP
On/off switchKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Power2 differ
Power supply unit (PSU) capacityDiffers120 W220 W
Number of power supply unitsKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (typical)Differs48 W80 W
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers4.7 kg9.5 kg
Weight (imperial)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source9.98 kg (22 lbs)
Packaging contentidentical
External power adapterKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Other features4 differ
Compatible operating systemsDiffersWindows OS Mac OS Linux OS UNIX OS- Windows - Mac OS - Linux - Unix
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs134 x 223 x 205 mm430 x 318 x 43 mm
Link/Act LEDKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Networking featuresDiffersGigabit EthernetEthernet, Fast Ethernet, Gigabit Ethernet
Power requirementsDiffers100 - 240 V, 50 - 60 Hz100 - 240V, 50/60Hz
Connectivity LEDsKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
FanKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source40 mm
Minimum system requirementsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source- Explorer 7.0+ - Opera 9.5+; Safari 2.0+ - Mozilla Firefox 2.0+
CertificationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceFCC, UL, CE, C-Tick, KCC, VCCI, RoHS
Designidentical
Chassis typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceRack (1U)
Number of fansKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3 fan(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More nas & storage servers comparisons

All nas & storage servers comparisons