Product comparison · 2 nas & storage servers

Lenovo Iomega ix4 300d NAS Desktop Marvell MV78230 vs Lenovo Iomega ix2

Add a product
  • 44specifications compared
  • 19differ
  • 25identical
  • 13known for one product only

Key differences

  • Total installed storage capacity
    • Iomega ix4 300d NAS Desktop Marvell MV78230:4 TB
    • Iomega ix2:2 TB
  • Number of storage drives installed
    • Iomega ix4 300d NAS Desktop Marvell MV78230:4
    • Iomega ix2:2
  • Number of storage drives supported
    • Iomega ix4 300d NAS Desktop Marvell MV78230:4
    • Iomega ix2:2
  • Maximum supported storage capacity
    • Iomega ix4 300d NAS Desktop Marvell MV78230:12 TB
    • Iomega ix2:6 TB
  • RAID levels
    • Iomega ix4 300d NAS Desktop Marvell MV78230:0, 1, 5, 10, JBOD
    • Iomega ix2:1, JBOD
  • Processor model
    • Iomega ix4 300d NAS Desktop Marvell MV78230:MV78230
    • Iomega ix2:6282
  • Processor frequency
    • Iomega ix4 300d NAS Desktop Marvell MV78230:1.3 GHz
    • Iomega ix2:1.6 GHz
  • Internal memory
    • Iomega ix4 300d NAS Desktop Marvell MV78230:0.5 GB
    • Iomega ix2:256 GB

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 300d, Iomega ix2
57 specifications
Storage5 differ
Total installed storage capacityDiffers4 TB2 TB
Number of storage drives installedDiffers42
Number of storage drives supportedDiffers42
Maximum supported storage capacityDiffers12 TB6 TB
RAID levelsDiffers0, 1, 5, 10, JBOD1, JBOD
Hot-swap drive baysKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Supported file systemsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceext2, ext3, ext4, FAT32, HFS+, NTFS
Processor2 differ
Processor modelDiffersMV782306282
Processor frequencyDiffers1.3 GHz1.6 GHz
Processor coresKnown for one2Unknown — not stated by the source
L2 cacheKnown for one1 MBUnknown — not stated by the source
Memory1 differ
Internal memoryDiffers0.5 GB256 GB
Networkidentical
iSCSI supportKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Ports & interfaces2 differ
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsDiffers21
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantityDiffers10
Designidentical
Cooling typeKnown for oneActiveUnknown — not stated by the source
Built-in displayKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Display typeKnown for oneLCDUnknown — not stated by the source
Performance2 differ
Backup featuresKnown for oneCloudUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of usersDiffers50 user(s)25 user(s)
Noise levelDiffers32 dB25.6 dB
On/off switchKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Software2 differ
Windows operating systems supportedDiffersWindows 7 Home Basic, Windows 7 Home Basic x64, Windows 7 Home Premium, Windows 7 Home Premium x64, Windows 7 Professional, Windows 7 Professional x64, Windows 7 Starter, Windows 7 Starter x64, Windows 7 Ultimate, Windows 7 Ultimate x64, Windows 8, Windows 8 Enterprise, Windows 8 Enterprise x64, WinWindows 7 Home Basic, Windows 7 Home Basic x64, Windows 7 Home Premium, Windows 7 Home Premium x64, Windows 7 Professional, Windows 7 Professional x64, Windows 7 Starter, Windows 7 Starter x64, Windows 7 Ultimate, Windows 7 Ultimate x64, Windows Vista Business, Windows Vista Business x64, Windows Vi
Mac operating systems supportedDiffersMac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard, Mac OS X 10.7 Lion, Mac OS X 10.8 Mountain LionMac OS X 10.5 Leopard, Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard, Mac OS X 10.7 Lion
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs60 W25 W
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers206.2 mm99.3 mm
DepthDiffers167.8 mm201.7 mm
HeightDiffers195.8 mm148.6 mm
WeightDiffers5.12 kg2.49 kg
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one5 - 35 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-10 - 60 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceLAN (RJ-45)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More nas & storage servers comparisons

All nas & storage servers comparisons