Product comparison · 2 nas & storage servers

Iomega StorCenter IX2-200 vs NETGEAR RND4220 0.25 GB 4 TB

10specifications compared
7differ
3identical
21known for one product only

Key differences

Total installed storage capacity
- StorCenter IX2-200:1 TB
- RND4220 0.25 GB 4 TB:4 TB
Storage drive capacity
- StorCenter IX2-200:500 GB
- RND4220 0.25 GB 4 TB:2 TB
Storage drive interface
- StorCenter IX2-200:Serial ATA II
- RND4220 0.25 GB 4 TB:Serial ATA
Power consumption (typical)
- StorCenter IX2-200:19 W
- RND4220 0.25 GB 4 TB:55 W
Compatible operating systems
- StorCenter IX2-200:Windows PC Mac OS Linux
- RND4220 0.25 GB 4 TB:Windows, Mac, Linux/UNIX
Power requirements
- StorCenter IX2-200:100 - 240V
- RND4220 0.25 GB 4 TB:100-240V AC, 50/60

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of IX2-200, RND4220
31 specifications	A Iomega StorCenter IX2-200 Model IX2-200 View product	B NETGEAR RND4220 0.25 GB 4 TB Model RND4220 View product
Storage3 differ
Total installed storage capacityDiffers	1 TB	4 TB
Storage drive capacityDiffers	500 GB	2 TB
Storage drive interfaceDiffers	Serial ATA II	Serial ATA
RAID levelsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0, 1, 5
Number of storage drives supportedKnown for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage drive sizeKnown for one	3.5"	Unknown — not stated by the source
Memoryidentical
Internal memoryKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.25 GB
Flash memoryKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	64 MB
Networkidentical
DHCP serverKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Data link protocolsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Ethernet
Compliance industry standardsKnown for one	IEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3u, IEEE 802.3ab	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cabling technologyKnown for one	10/100/1000Base-T(X)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Display typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	LCD
Performanceidentical
Access Control List (ACL)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Noise levelKnown for one	27 dB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	19 W	55 W
Power consumption (sleep)Known for one	5 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4.6 kg
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0 - 40 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	20 - 80%
Other features3 differ
Compatible operating systemsDiffers	Windows PC Mac OS Linux	Windows, Mac, Linux/UNIX
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	132 x 222 x 200 mm
Networking featuresDiffers	Gigabit Ethernet	CIFS/SMB, AFP 3.1, NFS v2 / v3, HTTP/S, FTP/S
Performance managementKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	SNMP
Power requirementsDiffers	100 - 240V	100-240V AC, 50/60
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	FCC, UL, CE, C-tick, RoHS
Processoridentical
Processor frequencyKnown for one	1 GHz	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More nas & storage servers comparisons

All nas & storage servers comparisons