Product comparison · 2 nas & storage servers

Iomega 3TB StorCenter Pro 450r Series vs NETGEAR ReadyNAS NV+ Gigabit Desktop Network Storage 3.0 TB

Add a product
  • 13specifications compared
  • 10differ
  • 3identical
  • 18known for one product only

Key differences

  • Number of storage drives installed
    • 3TB StorCenter Pro 450r Series:4
    • ReadyNAS NV+ Gigabit Desktop Network Storage 3.0 TB:7
  • Storage drive interface
    • 3TB StorCenter Pro 450r Series:Serial ATA II
    • ReadyNAS NV+ Gigabit Desktop Network Storage 3.0 TB:Serial ATA
  • RAID levels
    • 3TB StorCenter Pro 450r Series:0, 1, 5, 10, JBOD
    • ReadyNAS NV+ Gigabit Desktop Network Storage 3.0 TB:0, 1, 5
  • Internal memory
    • 3TB StorCenter Pro 450r Series:1 GB
    • ReadyNAS NV+ Gigabit Desktop Network Storage 3.0 TB:0.25 GB
  • USB 2.0 ports quantity
    • 3TB StorCenter Pro 450r Series:2
    • ReadyNAS NV+ Gigabit Desktop Network Storage 3.0 TB:3
  • Weight
    • 3TB StorCenter Pro 450r Series:11.3 kg
    • ReadyNAS NV+ Gigabit Desktop Network Storage 3.0 TB:4.6 kg
  • Dimensions (WxDxH)
    • 3TB StorCenter Pro 450r Series:440 x 540 x 41 mm
    • ReadyNAS NV+ Gigabit Desktop Network Storage 3.0 TB:132 x 222 x 200 mm
  • Networking features
    • 3TB StorCenter Pro 450r Series:Gigabit Ethernet
    • ReadyNAS NV+ Gigabit Desktop Network Storage 3.0 TB:10/ 100/ 1000 Ethernet

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 3TB StorCenter Pro 450r Series, ReadyNAS NV+ Gigabit Desktop Network Storage 3.0 TB
31 specifications
Storage3 differ
Number of storage drives installedDiffers47
Storage drive interfaceDiffersSerial ATA IISerial ATA
RAID levelsDiffers0, 1, 5, 10, JBOD0, 1, 5
Storage drive sizeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3.5"
Processoridentical
Processor frequencyKnown for one1.86 GHzUnknown — not stated by the source
Memory1 differ
Internal memoryDiffers1 GB0.25 GB
Flash memoryKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source64 MB
Networkidentical
Maximum data transfer rateKnown for one1000 Mbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source
Supported network protocolsKnown for oneTCP/IP, AppleTalk, IPXUnknown — not stated by the source
DHCP clientKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
DHCP serverKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for one2Unknown — not stated by the source
USB 2.0 ports quantityDiffers23
Designidentical
Chassis typeKnown for oneRack (1U)Unknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
Management protocolsKnown for oneCIFS/SMB, NFS, AFP, HTTP 1.1, FTP, WEBDAVUnknown — not stated by the source
Access Control List (ACL)Known for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Power supply unit (PSU) capacityKnown for one300 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (typical)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source55 W
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers11.3 kg4.6 kg
Other features4 differ
Compatible operating systemsDiffersMicrosoft Windows 2000 / XP Home / XP Professional / XP Professional x64 / Vista Mac X OS X 10.2.7 + Redhat 9, Mandrake 10, Debian 3.0, Gentoo, FedoraCore 3Windows, Mac, Linux/UNIX
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs440 x 540 x 41 mm132 x 222 x 200 mm
Minimum RAMKnown for one256 MBUnknown — not stated by the source
Networking featuresDiffersGigabit Ethernet10/ 100/ 1000 Ethernet
CertificationDiffersUL, C-UL, CE, ICES, FCC Class AFCC, UL, CE, C-tick, RoHS
I/O portsKnown for one1 x Ultra 320 SCSI LVD 1 x VGA 1 x COM 1 x Keyb 1 x MouseUnknown — not stated by the source
Power requirementsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source100-240 VAC; 50/60Hz
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0 - 40 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source20 - 80%

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More nas & storage servers comparisons

All nas & storage servers comparisons