Product comparison · 2 nas & storage servers

Iomega 1TB Gigabit Ethernet vs Iomega 2.0TB StorCenter Pro 400r Series

Add a product
  • 10specifications compared
  • 9differ
  • 1identical
  • 21known for one product only

Key differences

  • Storage drive capacity
    • 1TB Gigabit Ethernet:1 TB
    • 2.0TB StorCenter Pro 400r Series:500 GB
  • Storage drive interface
    • 1TB Gigabit Ethernet:Ultra-ATA/133
    • 2.0TB StorCenter Pro 400r Series:Serial ATA
  • RAID levels
    • 1TB Gigabit Ethernet:0, 1, 0+1, JBOD
    • 2.0TB StorCenter Pro 400r Series:0, 1, 5, JBOD
  • Weight
    • 1TB Gigabit Ethernet:5.8 kg
    • 2.0TB StorCenter Pro 400r Series:11.3 kg
  • Dimensions (WxDxH)
    • 1TB Gigabit Ethernet:187 x 279 x 172 mm
    • 2.0TB StorCenter Pro 400r Series:439.7 x 539.8 x 41.3 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of 1TB Gigabit Ethernet, 2.0TB StorCenter Pro 400r Series
31 specifications
Storage3 differ
Total installed storage capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2 TB
Number of storage drives installedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4
Storage drive capacityDiffers1 TB500 GB
Storage drive interfaceDiffersUltra-ATA/133Serial ATA
RAID levelsDiffers0, 1, 0+1, JBOD0, 1, 5, JBOD
Drive device, buffer size8 MB8 MB
Drive device, transfer rateKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source150 MB/s
HDD speedKnown for one7200 RPMUnknown — not stated by the source
Processoridentical
Processor frequencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3 GHz
Memoryidentical
Internal memoryKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 GB
Network1 differ
Compliance industry standardsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceIEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3u, IEEE 802.3ab
Maximum data transfer rateKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1000 Mbit/s
Supported network protocolsDiffersTCP/IPTCP/IP, AppleTalk, IPX, NetBEUI
Designidentical
Chassis typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceRack (1U)
Softwareidentical
Bundled softwareKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceIomega StorCenter Pro NAS Discovery Iomega Automatic Backup CA eTrust Antivirus 7.0
Poweridentical
Power supply unit (PSU) capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source300 W
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers5.8 kg11.3 kg
Other features4 differ
Compatible operating systemsDiffersMicrosoft Windows XP/2000/Me/98SE/NT 4.0; Mac OS X 10.2.7 +; Linux: Redhat 9, Mandrake 10, Debian 3.0, Gentoo, FedoraCore 3Interface.Windows 98SE/Me/2000/NT/XP/2003 Mac OS 8.x, 9.x, OS X
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs187 x 279 x 172 mm439.7 x 539.8 x 41.3 mm
Networking featuresDiffersHigh-speed Gigabit Ethernet (10/100/1000), 802.11g WirelessGigabit Ethernet
Security featuresKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceFile Level Security (ACLs) Kerberos 5.0 Microsoft Active Directory (AD) Microsoft NT Domain Controller (PDC)
CertificationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceUL, C–UL, CE, ICES, FCC Class A
I/O portsDiffers2 x USB 2.0 1 x 10/100/1000 Gigabit Ethernet2x Gigabit Ethernet (RJ-45) 1x Ultra 320 SCSI LVD (68-pin) 2x USB 2.0 1x COM 1x VGA
Minimum processorKnown for onePentium 300MhzUnknown — not stated by the source
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one302 x 398 x 300 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Power requirementsKnown for one110-220 VAC, 50-60 Hz, 5V 4.2A, 12V 3AUnknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one5 - 50 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one5 - 90%Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-40 - 70 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one84714100Unknown — not stated by the source
Products per palletKnown for one24 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More nas & storage servers comparisons

All nas & storage servers comparisons