Product comparison · 2 nas & storage servers

Iomega 1.0 TB vs Iomega StorCenter Pro 450r 1TB

Add a product
  • 18specifications compared
  • 14differ
  • 4identical
  • 17known for one product only

Key differences

  • Storage drive capacity
    • 1.0 TB:250 GB
    • StorCenter Pro 450r 1TB:1 TB
  • Processor frequency
    • 1.0 TB:0.4 GHz
    • StorCenter Pro 450r 1TB:1.86 GHz
  • Internal memory
    • 1.0 TB:0.125 GB
    • StorCenter Pro 450r 1TB:1 GB
  • Internal memory type
    • 1.0 TB:DDR
    • StorCenter Pro 450r 1TB:DDR2
  • USB 2.0 ports quantity
    • 1.0 TB:4
    • StorCenter Pro 450r 1TB:2
  • Weight
    • 1.0 TB:10 kg
    • StorCenter Pro 450r 1TB:11.3 kg
  • Operating temperature (T-T)
    • 1.0 TB:10 - 35 °C
    • StorCenter Pro 450r 1TB:5 - 40 °C
  • Operating relative humidity (H-H)
    • 1.0 TB:8 - 85%
    • StorCenter Pro 450r 1TB:20 - 85%

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of 1.0 TB, StorCenter Pro 450r 1TB
35 specifications
Storage1 differ
Number of storage drives installed44
Storage drive capacityDiffers250 GB1 TB
Storage drive interfaceSerial ATA IISerial ATA II
HDD speed7200 RPM7200 RPM
RAID levelsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0, 1, 5, 10
Drive device, buffer sizeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source8 MB
Drive device, transfer rateKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source150 MB/s
Processor1 differ
Processor frequencyDiffers0.4 GHz1.86 GHz
Processor modelKnown for one8347Unknown — not stated by the source
Memory2 differ
Internal memoryDiffers0.125 GB1 GB
Internal memory typeDiffersDDRDDR2
Network1 differ
Compliance industry standardsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceIEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3u
Maximum data transfer rateKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1000 Mbit/s
Supported network protocolsDiffersTCP/IP, CIFS/SMB, NFS, AFP, FTPTCP/IP, IPX, NetBEUI, CIFS/SMB, NFS, AFP, HTTP 1.1, FTP, WEBDAV
Ports & interfaces1 differ
USB 2.0 ports quantityDiffers42
Designidentical
LED indicatorsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Chassis typeKnown for oneDesktopUnknown — not stated by the source
Software1 differ
Operating system installedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceWindows Storage Server 2003 R2
Bundled softwareDiffersEMC Retrospect ExpressIomega NAS Discovery, EMC Retrospect Express, Backup 11.5, eTrust Antivirus 7.1, Nimbus MySAN iSCSI Target
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers10 kg11.3 kg
Operational conditions2 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs10 - 35 °C5 - 40 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs8 - 85%20 - 85%
Storage temperature (T-T)-10 - 60 °C-10 - 60 °C
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one5 - 90%Unknown — not stated by the source
Other features4 differ
Compatible operating systemsDiffersWindows 2000 / XP/ XP x64 / Vista Mac OS X 10.3.9 + Redhat 9, Mandrake 10, Debian 3.0 Gentoo, FedoraCore 3Windows 2000 / XP Home / XP Professional / 2003 Server; Mac OS 10.2.7; Redhat 9, Mandrake 10, Debian 3.0, Gentoo, FedoraCore 3; Novell NetWare 3.x, 4.x, 5.x
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs180 x 293 x 263 mm440 x 540 x 41 mm
Networking featuresDiffersVitesse VSC 8201 10/100/1000Gigabit Ethernet
Power requirementsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source100-240 VAC
CertificationDiffersUL, C-UL, CE, ICES, FCC Class B, TUV, VCCI, C-TICKUL, C-UL, CE, ICES, FCC A
Connectivity LEDsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
I/O portsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1xVGA, 1xCOM, 1xUltra 320 SCSI
Non-operating relative humidity (non-condensing)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source20 - 90%
Minimum RAMKnown for one256 MBUnknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
Access Control List (ACL)Known for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Power supply unit (PSU) capacityKnown for one300 WUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More nas & storage servers comparisons

All nas & storage servers comparisons