Product comparison · 2 nas & storage servers

Fujitsu FibreCAT SX80, 2 x SAS 300GB HDD vs Fujitsu FibreCAT SX80 iSCSI, 3 x 146GB SAS HDD

Add a product
  • 22specifications compared
  • 4differ
  • 18identical
  • 0known for one product only

Key differences

The Fujitsu FibreCAT SX80, 2 x SAS 300GB HDD has 0.162 TB more total installed storage capacity than the Fujitsu FibreCAT SX80 iSCSI, 3 x 146GB SAS HDD (0.6 TB vs 0.438 TB). The Fujitsu FibreCAT SX80 iSCSI, 3 x 146GB SAS HDD has 1 more storage drives installed than the Fujitsu FibreCAT SX80, 2 x SAS 300GB HDD (3 vs 2). The Fujitsu FibreCAT SX80, 2 x SAS 300GB HDD has 154 GB more storage drive capacity than the Fujitsu FibreCAT SX80 iSCSI, 3 x 146GB SAS HDD (300 GB vs 146 GB). Storage drive interface: Serial ATA on the Fujitsu FibreCAT SX80, 2 x SAS 300GB HDD, Serial Attached SCSI (SAS) on the Fujitsu FibreCAT SX80 iSCSI, 3 x 146GB SAS HDD.

  • Total installed storage capacity
    • FibreCAT SX80, 2 x SAS 300GB HDD:0.6 TB
    • FibreCAT SX80 iSCSI, 3 x 146GB SAS HDD:0.438 TB
  • Number of storage drives installed
    • FibreCAT SX80, 2 x SAS 300GB HDD:2
    • FibreCAT SX80 iSCSI, 3 x 146GB SAS HDD:3
  • Storage drive capacity
    • FibreCAT SX80, 2 x SAS 300GB HDD:300 GB
    • FibreCAT SX80 iSCSI, 3 x 146GB SAS HDD:146 GB
  • Storage drive interface
    • FibreCAT SX80, 2 x SAS 300GB HDD:Serial ATA
    • FibreCAT SX80 iSCSI, 3 x 146GB SAS HDD:Serial Attached SCSI (SAS)

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of FibreCAT SX80, 2 x SAS 300GB HDD, FibreCAT SX80 iSCSI, 3 x 146GB SAS HDD
22 specifications
Storage4 differ
Total installed storage capacityDiffers0.6 TB0.438 TB
Number of storage drives installedDiffers23
Storage drive capacityDiffers300 GB146 GB
Storage drive interfaceDiffersSerial ATASerial Attached SCSI (SAS)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More nas & storage servers comparisons

All nas & storage servers comparisons