Product comparison · 2 nas & storage servers

Fujitsu ETERNUS DX80 vs NETGEAR RN12P1210 1.2 TB

11specifications compared
11differ
0identical
18known for one product only

Key differences

Total installed storage capacity
- ETERNUS DX80:0.9 TB
- RN12P1210 1.2 TB:1.2 TB
Number of storage drives installed
- ETERNUS DX80:2
- RN12P1210 1.2 TB:12
Storage drive capacity
- ETERNUS DX80:450 GB
- RN12P1210 1.2 TB:1 TB
RAID levels
- ETERNUS DX80:0, 1, 1+0, 5, 6
- RN12P1210 1.2 TB:0, 1, 5, 6
Power consumption (typical)
- ETERNUS DX80:3774 W
- RN12P1210 1.2 TB:700 W
Weight
- ETERNUS DX80:35 g
- RN12P1210 1.2 TB:32.8 kg
Operating temperature (T-T)
- ETERNUS DX80:5 - 40 °C
- RN12P1210 1.2 TB:0 - 40 °C
Dimensions (WxDxH)
- ETERNUS DX80:483 x 650 x 88 mm
- RN12P1210 1.2 TB:437 x 648 x 89 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of ETERNUS DX80, RN12P1210
29 specifications	A Fujitsu ETERNUS DX80 View product	B NETGEAR RN12P1210 1.2 TB Model RN12P1210 View product
Storage4 differ
Total installed storage capacityDiffers	0.9 TB	1.2 TB
Number of storage drives installedDiffers	2	12
Storage drive capacityDiffers	450 GB	1 TB
Storage drive interfaceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Serial ATA II
RAID levelsDiffers	0, 1, 1+0, 5, 6	0, 1, 5, 6
Number of storage drives supportedKnown for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum supported storage capacityKnown for one	120 TB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Networkidentical
DHCP serverKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
iSCSI supportKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Supported network protocolsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	CIFS/SMB, AFP 3.1, NFS v2/v3, HTTP/S, FTP/S
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2
Performanceidentical
Access Control List (ACL)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power1 differ
Power supply unit (PSU) capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	170 W
Redundant power supply (RPS) supportKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power consumption (typical)Differs	3774 W	700 W
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers	35 g	32.8 kg
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs	5 - 40 °C	0 - 40 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	20 - 80%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other features4 differ
Compatible operating systemsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Microsoft Windows 2000 (SP4), XP Home/Pro (SP1/SP2), Vista, Macintosh OS-X, Linux
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs	483 x 650 x 88 mm	437 x 648 x 89 mm
Minimum system requirementsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Internet Explorer 7.0+ Opera 9.5+ Safari 2.0+ Mozilla Firefox 2.0+
Networking featuresDiffers	Gigabit Ethernet	10/100/1000 Ethernet
Power requirementsDiffers	AC 100 - 120V/200 - 240V @ 50/60Hz	100 – 240V AC, 50/60 Hz
CertificationDiffers	UL60950-1, CSA60950-1, EN60950-1, IEC60950-1, GOST, FCC Part-15 Class A, ICES-003 Class A, EN55022 Class A, VCCI Class A, AS/NZS CISPR22 Class A, CNS13438(C6357) Class A, C-Tick, BSMI, EN 55024, CE, RoHS, WEEE	FCC, CE, C-Tick, KCC, VCCI, RoHS
Non-operating relative humidity (non-condensing)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	20 - 80%
RAID controller typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	X-RAID2
Cache internalKnown for one	1024 MB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Processoridentical
Processor frequencyKnown for one	1.2 GHz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Chassis typeKnown for one	Rack (2U)	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More nas & storage servers comparisons

All nas & storage servers comparisons