Product comparison · 2 nas & storage servers

Fujitsu ETERNUS DX80 vs LG N2R1DB2 NAS/storage server

11specifications compared
9differ
2identical
22known for one product only

Key differences

Total installed storage capacity
- ETERNUS DX80:0.9 TB
- N2R1DB2 NAS/storage server:1 TB
Storage drive capacity
- ETERNUS DX80:450 GB
- N2R1DB2 NAS/storage server:500 GB
RAID levels
- ETERNUS DX80:0, 1, 1+0, 5, 6
- N2R1DB2 NAS/storage server:0, 1, 0+1, JBOD
Processor frequency
- ETERNUS DX80:1.2 GHz
- N2R1DB2 NAS/storage server:0.8 GHz
Power consumption (typical)
- ETERNUS DX80:3774 W
- N2R1DB2 NAS/storage server:44 W
Weight
- ETERNUS DX80:35 g
- N2R1DB2 NAS/storage server:5.2 kg
Dimensions (WxDxH)
- ETERNUS DX80:483 x 650 x 88 mm
- N2R1DB2 NAS/storage server:165.1 x 231.1 x 162.5 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of ETERNUS DX80, N2R1DB2
33 specifications	A Fujitsu ETERNUS DX80 View product	B LG N2R1DB2 NAS/storage server Model N2R1DB2 View product
Storage3 differ
Total installed storage capacityDiffers	0.9 TB	1 TB
Number of storage drives installed	2	2
Storage drive capacityDiffers	450 GB	500 GB
Storage drive interfaceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Serial ATA II
Storage drive sizeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3.5"
RAID levelsDiffers	0, 1, 1+0, 5, 6	0, 1, 0+1, JBOD
Hot-swap drive baysKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Number of storage drives supportedKnown for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum supported storage capacityKnown for one	120 TB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Processor1 differ
Processor frequencyDiffers	1.2 GHz	0.8 GHz
Memoryidentical
Internal memoryKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 GB
Networkidentical
DHCP clientKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
DHCP serverKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Compliance industry standardsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	IEEE802.3
Maximum data transfer rateKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1000 Mbit/s
Supported network protocolsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	TCP/IP, HTTP/HTTPS, FTP/FTPS
Ports & interfacesidentical
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3
eSATAKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Performanceidentical
Optical drive typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	DVD-RW
Compatible memory cardsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	MMC, SD, xD
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	3774 W	44 W
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers	35 g	5.2 kg
Other features3 differ
Compatible operating systemsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Win 2000, XP, Vista, Windows Server 2003 Mac OS 10.3+ Linux (Redhat 9, Ubuntu, Suse)
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs	483 x 650 x 88 mm	165.1 x 231.1 x 162.5 mm
Link/Act LEDKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Networking features	Gigabit Ethernet	Gigabit Ethernet
Power requirementsDiffers	AC 100 - 120V/200 - 240V @ 50/60Hz	90-264V, 47/63Hz
CertificationDiffers	UL60950-1, CSA60950-1, EN60950-1, IEC60950-1, GOST, FCC Part-15 Class A, ICES-003 Class A, EN55022 Class A, VCCI Class A, AS/NZS CISPR22 Class A, CNS13438(C6357) Class A, C-Tick, BSMI, EN 55024, CE, RoHS, WEEE	FCC, UL, CE, CEMarking, RoHS
Cache internalKnown for one	1024 MB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Chassis typeKnown for one	Rack (2U)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	5 - 40 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	20 - 80%	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More nas & storage servers comparisons

All nas & storage servers comparisons